English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131938
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Are 'STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus'?: Challenging disciplinary stereotypes of research's social value

AuthorsOlmos Peñuela, Julia ; Benneworth, Paul; Castro Martínez, Elena
KeywordsKnowledge transfer
User engagement
Research policy
Social sciences and humanities
Research utilisation
Issue Date2014
PublisherOxford University Press
CitationScience and Public Policy 41(3): 384-400 (2014)
AbstractThere is a reasonably settled consensus within the innovation community that science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) research is more ‘useful’ to societies than other types of research, notably social sciences and humanities (SSH) research. Our paper questions this assumption, and seeks to empirically test whether STEM researchers’ practices make their research more useful than that of SSH researchers. A critical reading of the discussion around SSH research supports developing a taxonomy of differences. This is tested using a database of 1,583 researchers from the Spanish Council for Scientific Research. Results do not support the view that SSH research is less useful than STEM research, even if differences are found in the nature of both transfer practices and their research users. The assumption that STEM research is more useful than SSH research needs revision if research policy is to properly focus on research which is useful for society.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/131938
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct071
Identifiersdoi: 10.1093/scipol/sct071
issn: 0302-3427
e-issn: 1471-5430
Appears in Collections:(INGENIO) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.