English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/131722
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Defining Planktonic Protist Functional Groups on Mechanisms for Energy and Nutrient Acquisition: Incorporation of Diverse Mixotrophic Strategies

AuthorsMitra, Aditee; Calbet, Albert ; Lundgren, Veronica
KeywordsPlankton functional types
Phagotroph
Phototroph
Mixotroph
Phytoplankton
Microzoo-plankton
PFTs
Issue DateApr-2016
PublisherUrban and Fischer
CitationProtist 167(2): 106-120 (2016)
AbstractArranging organisms into functional groups aids ecological research by grouping organisms (irrespective of phylogenetic origin) that interact with environmental factors in similar ways. Planktonic protists traditionally have been split between photoautotrophic “phytoplankton” and phagotrophic “microzooplankton”. However, there is a growing recognition of the importance of mixotrophy in euphotic aquatic systems, where many protists often combine photoautotrophic and phagotrophic modes of nutrition. Such organisms do not align with the traditional dichotomy of phytoplankton and microzooplankton. To reflect this understanding, we propose a new functional grouping of planktonic protists in an eco-physiological context: (i) phagoheterotrophs lacking phototrophic capacity, (ii) photoautotrophs lacking phagotrophic capacity, (iii) constitutive mixotrophs (CMs) as phagotrophs with an inherent capacity for phototrophy, and (iv) non-constitutive mixotrophs (NCMs) that acquire their phototrophic capacity by ingesting specific (SNCM) or general non-specific (GNCM) prey. For the first time, we incorporate these functional groups within a foodweb structure and show, using model outputs, that there is scope for significant changes in trophic dynamics depending on the protist functional type description. Accordingly, to better reflect the role of mixotrophy, we recommend that as important tools for explanatory and predictive research, aquatic food-web and biogeochemical models need to redefine the protist groups within their frameworks
DescriptionMitra, Aditee ... et al.-- 15 pages, 5 figures
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/131722
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.01.003
issn: 1434-4610
e-issn: 1618-0941
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mitra_et_al_2016.pdf597,76 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.