English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/130321
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuber, John D.-
dc.contributor.authorMayoral, Laura-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-21T12:07:10Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-21T12:07:10Z-
dc.date.issued2012-11-07-
dc.identifier.citationCivil Conflict and Rationality. Barcelona GSE Summer Forum (2013)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/130321-
dc.descriptionPresentado como comunicación en el Department of Political Science, Columbia University in the City of New York, en noviembre de 2012 Presentado como comunicación en "Concentration on Conflict", Civil Conflict and Rationality. Barcelona GSE Summer Forum, celebrado del 10 al 12 de junio de 2013 en Barcelona (España)-
dc.description.abstractMost empirical studies on civil conflict are not able to find a significant relationship between interpersonal-measures of economic inequality and the likelihood of conflict. When individuals belong to groups, general inequality (measured by the Gini) can be decomposed into three components: between-group inequality (BGI), within-group inequality (WGI), and ‘Overlap’ (which is inversely related to the economic segregation of groups). This paper shows that is possible to establish a robust empirical relation between group-based measures of income differences and con- flict. Drawing on over 200 individual-level surveys from 89 countries, we create a new data set that allows us to measure these three components and to examine their empirical relationship with civil conflict. Consistent with Esteban and Ray’s (2011) argument about the need for labor and capital to fight civil wars, we find a strong, robust positive association between WGI and civil conflict. And consistent with the “contact hypothesis” in sociology, we find that the economic segregation of groups (as measured by a lower Overlap component) is often associated with more civil conflict. Since some components of inequality are associated with more civil conflict but others are associated with less, the analysis helps explain why it has been difficult to identify a relationship between general inequality and civil war. And the strong finding for WGI underscores the value of developing clear theories about how the internal characteristics of groups influence the incidence of civil conflict-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.titleCivil Conflict and Three Dimensions of Ethnic Inequality-
dc.typecomunicación de congreso-
dc.date.updated2016-03-21T12:07:10Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.relation.csic-
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Huber-Civil-Conflict-2012-11.pdf1,89 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.