Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invite to open peer review

Assessing the Impact of Different Measurement Time Intervals on Observed Long-Term Wind Speed Trends

AuthorsAzorín-Molina, César CSIC ORCID; Vicente Serrano, Sergio M. CSIC ORCID ; McVicar, Tim R.; Jerez, Sonia; Revuelto, Jesús CSIC ORCID; López-Moreno, Juan I. CSIC ORCID
Issue Date14-Dec-2015
AbstractDuring the last two decades climate studies have reported a tendency toward a decline in measured near-surface wind speed in some regions of Europe, North America, Asia and Australia. This weakening in observed wind speed has been recently termed >global stilling>, showing a worldwide average trend of -0.140 m s -1 dec -1 during last 50-years. The precise cause of the >global stilling> remains largely uncertain and has been hypothetically attributed to several factors, mainly related to: (i) an increasing surface roughness (i.e. forest growth, land use changes, and urbanization); (ii) a slowdown in large-scale atmospheric circulation; (iii) instrumental drifts and technological improvements, maintenance, and shifts in measurements sites and calibration issues; (iv) sunlight dimming due to air pollution; and (v) astronomical changes. This study proposed a novel investigation aimed at analyzing how different measurement time intervals used to calculate a wind speed series can affect the sign and magnitude of long-term wind speed trends. For instance, National Weather Services across the globe estimate daily average wind speed using different time intervals and formulae that may affect the trend results. Here we analyzed near-surface wind speed trends recorded at 19 land-based stations across Spain comparing monthly mean wind speed series obtained from: (a) daily mean wind speed data averaged from standard 10-min mean observations at 0000, 0700, 1300 and 1800 UTC; and (b) average wind speed of 24 hourly measurements (i.e., wind run measurements) from 0000 to 2400 UTC. As a complementary analysis, in this study we also quantified the impact of anemometer drift (i.e. bearing malfunction) by presenting preliminary results (i.e. 11 months of paired measurements) from a comparison of one new anemometer sensor against one malfunctioned anemometer sensor due to old bearings.
Appears in Collections:(IPE) Comunicaciones congresos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Poster2_AGU_CAzorin.pdf207,55 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

checked on May 26, 2024


checked on May 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM




WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.