Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/128247COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
 SHARE
 CORE
BASE
|
|
| Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ebrahim, Ali | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Nogales, Juan | es_ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Thiele, Ines | es_ES |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Molecular Systems Biology 11: 831 (2015) | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1744-4292 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/128247 | - |
| dc.description | 3 p. Ebrahim, Ali et al. | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Constraint‐based analysis of genome‐scale models (GEMs) arose shortly after the first genome sequences became available. As numerous reviews of the field show, this approach and methodology has proven to be successful in studying a wide range of biological phenomena (McCloskey et al, 2013; Bordbar et al, 2014). However, efforts to expand the user base are impeded by hurdles in correctly formulating these problems to obtain numerical solutions. In particular, in a study entitled “An exact arithmetic toolbox for a consistent and reproducible structural analysis of metabolic network models” (Chindelevitch et al, 2014), the authors apply an exact solver to 88 genome‐scale constraint‐based models of metabolism. The authors claim that COBRA calculations (Orth et al, 2010) are inconsistent with their results and that many published and actively used (Lee et al, 2007; McCloskey et al, 2013) genome‐scale models do support cellular growth in existing studies only because of numerical errors. They base these broad claims on two observations: (i) three reconstructions (iAF1260, iIT341, and iNJ661) compute feasibly in COBRA, but are infeasible when exact numerical algorithms are used by their software (entitled MONGOOSE); (ii) linear programs generated by MONGOOSE for iIT341 were submitted to the NEOS Server (a Web site that runs linear programs through various solvers) and gave inconsistent results. They further claim that a large percentage of these COBRA models are actually unable to produce biomass flux. Here, we demonstrate that the claims made by Chindelevitch et al (2014) stem from an incorrect parsing of models from files rather than actual problems with numerical error or COBRA computations. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | European Molecular Biology Organization | es_ES |
| dc.relation.isversionof | Publisher's version | es_ES |
| dc.rights | openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.title | Do genome-scale models need exact solvers or clearer standards? | es_ES |
| dc.type | artículo | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.15252/msb.20156157 | - |
| dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15252/msb.20156157 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.e-issn | 1744-4292 | - |
| dc.rights.license | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | es_ES |
| dc.relation.csic | Sí | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 26467284 | - |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | es_ES |
| item.openairetype | artículo | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | (CIB) Artículos | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
| Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebrahim_et_al-2015-Molecular_Systems_Biology.pdf | Artículo principal | 148,43 kB | Adobe PDF |  Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
PubMed Central
Citations
32
checked on 01-abr-2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
43
checked on 15-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
39
checked on 27-feb-2024
Page view(s)
190
checked on 18-abr-2024
Download(s)
179
checked on 18-abr-2024
