English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/127998
Título

Rats and Seabirds: Effects of Egg Size on Predation Risk and the Potential of Conditioned Taste Aversion as a Mitigation Method

AutorLatorre, Lucía ; Larrinaga, Asier R.; Santamaría, Luis
Fecha de publicación18-sep-2013
EditorPublic Library of Science
CitaciónPLoS ONE 8(9): e76138 (2013)
ResumenSeabirds nesting on islands are threatened by invasive rodents, such as mice and rats, which may attack eggs, chicks and even adults. The low feasibility of rat eradications on many islands makes the development of alternate control plans necessary. We used a combination of field experiments on a Mediterranean island invaded by black rats (Rattus rattus) to evaluate (1) the predation risk posed to different-sized seabird eggs and (2), the potential of two deterrent methods (electronic and chemical) to reduce its impact. Rats were able to consume eggs of all sizes (12 to 68 g), but survival increased 13 times from the smallest to the largest eggs (which also had more resistant eggshells). Extrapolation to seabird eggs suggests that the smallest species (Hydrobates pelagicus) suffer the most severe predation risk, but even the largest (Larus michahellis) could suffer >60% mortality. Nest attack was not reduced by the deterrents. However, chemical deterrence (conditioned taste aversion by lithium chloride) slowed the increase in predation rate over time, which resulted in a three-fold increase in egg survival to predation as compared to both control and electronic deterrence. At the end of the experimental period, this effect was confirmed by a treatment swap, which showed that conferred protection remains at least 15 days after cessation of the treatment. Results indicate that small seabird species are likely to suffer severe rates of nest predation by rats and that conditioned taste aversion, but not electronic repellents, may represent a suitable method to protect colonies when eradication or control is not feasible or cost-effective. © 2013 Latorre et al.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076138
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/127998
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0076138
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076138
issn: 1932-6203
Aparece en las colecciones: (IMEDEA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Latorre-PLOS-ONE-2013-v8-e76138.pdf953,39 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 

Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.