Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/127655
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Título: | A comparative study between non-linear regression and artificial neural network approaches for modelling wild oat (Avena fatua) field emergence |
Autor: | Chantre, Guillermo R.; Blanco, Antonio M.; Forcella, Frank; Acker, Rene C. van; Sabbatini, M. R.; González-Andújar, José Luis CSIC ORCID | Fecha de publicación: | 23-ene-2013 | Editor: | Cambridge University Press | Citación: | Journal of Agricultural Science 152(2): 254- 262 (2014) | Resumen: | Non-linear regression (NLR) techniques are used widely to fit weed field emergence patterns to soil microclimatic indices using S-type functions. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) present interesting and alternative features for such modelling purposes. In the present work, a univariate hydrothermal-time based Weibull model and a bivariate (hydro-time and thermal-time) ANN were developed to study wild oat emergence under non-moisture restriction conditions using data from different locations worldwide. Results indicated a higher accuracy of the neural network in comparison with the NLR approach due to the improved descriptive capacity of thermal-time and the hydro-time as independent explanatory variables. The bivariate ANN model outperformed the conventional Weibull approach, in terms of RMSE of the test set, by 70·8%. These outcomes suggest the potential applicability of the proposed modelling approach in the design of weed management decision support systems. | Versión del editor: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612001098 | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/127655 | DOI: | 10.1017/S0021859612001098 | Identificadores: | doi: 10.1017/S0021859612001098 issn: 1469-5146 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (IAS) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
accesoRestringido.pdf | 15,38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
checked on 11-abr-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
9
checked on 20-feb-2024
Page view(s)
306
checked on 23-abr-2024
Download(s)
83
checked on 23-abr-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.