English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/12685
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 27 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Título

Evidence for long-term uplift on the Canary Islands from emergent Mio–Pliocene littoral deposits

AutorMeco, Joaquín; Scaillet, Stéphane; Guillou, Hervé; Lomoschitz, Alejandro; Carracedo, Juan Carlos ; Ballester, Javier; Betancort, Juan Francisco; Cilleros, Antonio
Palabras claveUplift
Canary Islands
Miocene
Pliocene
Marine deposits
Fecha de publicación11-ene-2007
EditorElsevier
CitaciónGlobal and Planetary Change 57(3-4): 222-234 (2007)
ResumenSeveral islands in the Canarian archipelago show marine deposits with identical fossil faunas, which are generally assigned to different glacioeustatic marine episodes: mainly Pleistocene episodes in Lanzarote and Fuerteventura, and Mio–Pliocene ones in Gran Canaria.
Three fossil species (Saccostrea chili, Nerita emiliana and Strombus coronatus) characterize all the marine deposits from southern Lanzarote, to the west and south of Fuerteventura and northeast of Gran Canaria. Three other species (Ancilla glandiformis, Rothpletzia rudista and Siderastraea miocenica) confirm the chronostratigraphic attribution of these deposits. Other more occasional fossils (as Chlamys latissima, Isognomon soldanii and Clypeaster aegyptiacus) fit an upper Miocene and lower Pliocene age. This agrees with new K/Ar ages obtained from pillow lavas emplaced into the marine deposits (ca. 4.1 Ma in Gran Canaria, ca. 4.8 Ma in Fuerteventura) and from underlying (ca. 9.3 Ma in Gran Canaria) or overlying (ca. 9.8 Ma in Lanzarote) lava flows.
The marine deposits are eroded but large continuous segments are preserved sloping gently towards the coast. Variations in the highest and the lowest elevations of the deposits apsl (above present sea level) indicate post-depositional uplift movements. Glacioeustatic causes are unlikely to be responsible for these variations on the basis of the coastal location of the deposits and their equatorial fauna characteristic of Mio–Pliocene corals. Differential uplift of the deposits across the archipelago is argued to result from the progressive seaward tilting of the islands along the insular volcanic trail marking the westward migration of hot spot head since 20 Ma. Successive westward accretion of younger volcanic edifices resulted in increasing lithostatic load of the crust with progressive (diachronous) tilting of the older edifices and their palaeo-shorelines marked by past coastal deposits.
Descripción13 pages, 9 figures, 1 table.-- Printed version published Jun 2007.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.040
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/12685
DOI10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.040
ISSN0921-8181
Aparece en las colecciones: (IPNA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.