English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/12622
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and speciation in the avian genus Saxicola

AuthorsIllera, Juan Carlos ; Richardson, David S.; Helm, Barbara; Atienza, Juan Carlos; Emerson, Brent C.
KeywordsBiogeography
Cryptic speciation
Phylogeny
Saxicola
Issue Date20-May-2008
PublisherElsevier
CitationMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48(3): 1145-1154 (2008)
AbstractThe avian genus Saxicola is distributed throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and various islands across Oceania. Despite the fact that the group has great potential as a model to test evolutionary hypotheses due to the extensive variability in life history patterns recorded between and within species, the phylogenetic relationships among species and subspecies of this genus are poorly understood. We undertook a systematic investigation of the relationships within this genus with three main objectives in mind, (1) to test the monophyly of the genus; (2) to ascertain geographical origin and dispersal sequence; and (3) to test for monophyly within the most morphologically diverse species, S. torquata and S. caprata. We studied sequence data from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene from 11 of the 12 recognized species and 15 of the 45 described subspecies. Four clades, two exclusively Asian, one Eurasian, and the fourth encompassing Eurasia and Africa, were identified. Based on our analyses, monophyly of the genus Saxicola is not supported and an Asian origin for the genus can be inferred. Results from DIVA analyses, tree topology and nodal age estimates suggest independent colonisation events from Asia to Africa and from Asia to the Western Palearctic, with the Sahara desert acting as a natural barrier for S. torquata. Subspecies and populations of S. torquata are not monophyletic due to S. tectes, S. dacotiae and S. leucura grouping within this complex. Subspecies and populations of S. caprata are monophyletic. Importantly, within S. torquata and S. caprata, slight morphological traits and plumage colour pattern differences used to recognize subspecies are indicative of the greater cryptic diversification that has occurred within this genus.
Description10 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables, 1 appendix.-- PMID: 18571939 [PubMed].-- Printed version published Sep 2008.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.016
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/12622
DOI10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.016
ISSN1055-7903
Appears in Collections:(IPNA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.