English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/122618
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Comparing Sudden Stratospheric Warming Definitions in Reanalysis Data*

AutorPalmeiro, Froila M.; Barriopedro, David ; García Herrera, Ricardo ; Calvo, N.
Palabras claveStratospheric circulation
Extreme events
Stratosphere-troposphere coupling
Climate prediction
Climate variability
Fecha de publicación1-sep-2015
EditorAmerican Meteorological Society
CitaciónJournal of Climate, 28(17): 6823–6840 (2015)
ResumenSudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are characterized by a pronounced increase of the stratospheric polar temperature during the winter season. Different definitions have been used in the literature to diagnose the occurrence of SSWs, yielding discrepancies in the detected events. The aim of this paper is to compare the SSW climatologies obtained by different methods using reanalysis data. The occurrences of Northern Hemisphere SSWs during the extended-winter season and the 1958–2014 period have been identified for a suite of eight representative definitions and three different reanalyses. Overall, and despite the differences in the number and exact dates of occurrence of SSWs, the main climatological signatures of SSWs are not sensitive to the considered reanalysis. The mean frequency of SSWs is 6.7 events decade−1, but it ranges from 4 to 10 events, depending on the method. The seasonal cycle of events is statistically indistinguishable across definitions, with a common peak in January. However, the multidecadal variability is method dependent, with only two definitions displaying minimum frequencies in the 1990s. An analysis of the mean signatures of SSWs in the stratosphere revealed negligible differences among methods compared to the large case-to-case variability within a given definition. The stronger and more coherent tropospheric signals before and after SSWs are associated with major events, which are detected by most methods. The tropospheric signals of minor SSWs are less robust, representing the largest source of discrepancy across definitions. Therefore, to obtain robust results, future studies on stratosphere–troposphere coupling should aim to minimize the detection of minor warmings.
Aparece en las colecciones: (IGEO) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
JC_2015_28_6823.pdf7,21 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Mostrar el registro completo

Artículos relacionados:

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.