English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/121498
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGirón Moreno, Ignacio F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCorell González, M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Palomo, M. J.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGalindo Egea, A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorrecillas Melendreras, Arturoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Lucas, Félixes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMoriana, Alfonsoes_ES
dc.date.issued2015-08-10-
dc.identifier.citationAgricultural Water Management 161: 114–126 (2015)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/121498-
dc.description12 páginas.-- 10 figuras.-- 4 tablas.-- 43 referencias.--es_ES
dc.description.abstractRegulated deficit irrigation (RDI) results are affected by the actual water stress level reached during the treatments. The irrigation scheduling based on water status measurements, such as trunk diameter fluctuations, can control in an accurate way the water restrictions. However, the number of works that use these indicators as isolate parameter to control the schedule is scarce in general, and very scarce in olive trees. Building on previous works, the aim of this article is to schedule an RDI strategy in olive trees based on threshold values of maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) and trunk growth rate (TGR) without reference trees. The experiment was performed in a 40 years-old table olive orchard (cv Manzanillo) in Seville (Spain) for 3 years (seasons from 2011 to 2013). Three different irrigation treatments were considered in a completely randomized block design. Control trees were over-irrigated (125% crop evapotranspiration, ETc) in order to obtain fully irrigated conditions. Water stress conditions were applied during Phase II (pit hardening) in the RDI-2 treatment or during Phase II and Phase I (full bloom) in RDI-12. In both RDIs, a treatment recovery (Phase III) was performed before harvest. The trunk diameter fluctuation indicator was selected according to the phenological stage. TGR was used in conditions of full irrigation or moderate water stress level, such as Phase I and Phase III. TGR threshold values based on previous works were selected: 20 mday−1, RDI-2; 10 mday−1, RDI-12 (Phase I) and −5 mday−1, both treatments, Phase III. Only in one season RDI-2 was scheduled with TGR values (−10 mday−1) during Phase II. MDS threshold values were determined as the ratio between measured MDS and fully irrigated MDS (the so called MDS signal). The latter was estimated from a baseline. During Phase II, RDI-2 was irrigated with a threshold value of 0.9, while RDI-12 was irrigated with a threshold value of 0.75. MDS signal was not useful for most of the period considered and it did not agree well with fruit drop or fruit size. Conversely, the average of TGR during Phase II was significantly linked to fruit drop and fruit size, and so were the midday stem water potential and stress integral. Recommendations about the management of TGR are discussed. The water stress level in the experiments was moderate and no significant differences in yield were found. However, the trend of yield reduction in RDI-12 was likely related with a fruit drop and a reduction in crown volume. The yield quality did not decrease in the RDIs treatments, on the contrary, pulp:stone ratio improved significantly in some of the seasons.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN), (AGL2010-19201-CO4-03 and AGL2013-45922-C2-1-R). Thanks are due to J. Rodriguez and A. Montero for help with field measurements.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPreprint-
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectMDSes_ES
dc.subjectStress integrales_ES
dc.subjectTGRes_ES
dc.subjectWater potentiales_ES
dc.subjectWater relationses_ES
dc.titleFeasibility of trunk diameter fluctuations in the scheduling of regulated deficit irrigation for table olive trees without reference treeses_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.014-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.014es_ES
dc.identifier.e-issn0378-3774-
dc.relation.csices_ES
Appears in Collections:(IRNAS) Artículos
(CEBAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AGWAT7360R1-3.pdf807,18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.