English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/121004
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

The phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles in essential tremor is associated with the relative strength of supraspinal and afferent input

AutorGallego, Juan Álvaro ; Dideriksen, Jakob L.; Holobar, Ales; Ibáñez Pereda, Jaime ; Glaser, Vojko; Romero, Juan P.; Benito-León, Julián; Pons Rovira, José Luis ; Rocón, Eduardo ; Farina, Dario
Palabras claveEMG
Essential tremor
IA afferents
Motor unit
Fecha de publicaciónjun-2015
EditorSociety for Neuroscience
CitaciónJournal of Neuroscience 35(23): 8925-8937 (2015)
ResumenThe pathophysiology of essential tremor (ET), the most common movement disorder, is not fully understood. We investigated which factors determine the variability in the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles, a long-standing observation yet unexplained. We used a computational model to simulate the effects of different levels of voluntary and tremulous synaptic input to antagonistic motoneuron pools on the tremor. We compared these simulations to data from 11 human ET patients. In both analyses, the neural drive to muscle was represented as the pooled spike trains of several motor units, which provides an accurate representation of the common synaptic input to motoneurons. The simulations showed that, for each voluntary input level, the phase difference between neural drives to antagonist muscles is determined by the relative strength of the supraspinal tremor input to the motoneuron pools. In addition, when the supraspinal tremor input to one muscle was weak or absent, Ia afferents provided significant common tremor input due to passive stretch. The simulations predicted that without a voluntary drive (rest tremor) the neural drives would be more likely in phase, while a concurrent voluntary input (postural tremor) would lead more frequently to an out-of-phase pattern. The experimental results matched these predictions, showing a significant change in phase difference between postural and rest tremor. They also indicated that the common tremor input is always shared by the antagonistic motoneuron pools, in agreement with the simulations. Our results highlight that the interplay between supraspinal input and spinal afferents is relevant for tremor generation.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0106-15.2015
Aparece en las colecciones: (CAR) Artículos
(IC) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Strength of Supraspinal.pdf2,26 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Mostrar el registro completo

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.