Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/120910
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation.

AutorZhao, Huaying; Alfonso, Carlos CSIC ORCID ; Schuck, Peter
Fecha de publicación21-may-2015
EditorPublic Library of Science
CitaciónPLoS ONE 10(5): e0126420
ResumenAnalytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.
Descripción30 p.-14 fig. Zhao, Huaying, et alt.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0126420
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/120910
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0126420
ISSN1932-6203
E-ISSN1932-6203
Aparece en las colecciones: (CIB) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
PLOS_ONE_2015_Alfonso.pdfArtículo principal1,72 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

47
checked on 11-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

74
checked on 16-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

61
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

279
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

202
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


Este item está licenciado bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons