1. DIGITAL.CSIC
  2. Recursos Naturales
  3. Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC)
  4. (IREC) Artículos
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/11850
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE

Comparte tu historia
de Acceso Abierto
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLabruna, Marcelo B.-
dc.contributor.authorNaranjo, María Victoria-
dc.contributor.authorMangold, Atilio J.-
dc.contributor.authorEstrada-Peña, Agustín-
dc.contributor.authorJongejan, Frans-
dc.contributor.authorFuente, José de la-
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-26T09:36:28Z-
dc.date.available2009-03-26T09:36:28Z-
dc.date.issued2009-02-25-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 46 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/11850-
dc.description12 pages, 5 figures.-- PMID: 19243585 [PubMed].-- PMCID: PMC2656471.-- Supporting information (Microsatellite genotypes of individual tick crosses, XLS file) available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1471-2148-9-46-s1.xls.-- et al.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Background]: The cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, economically impact cattle industry in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. The morphological and genetic differences among R. microplus strains have been documented in the literature, suggesting that biogeographical and ecological separation may have resulted in boophilid ticks from America/Africa and those from Australia being different species. To test the hypothesis of the presence of different boophilid species, herein we performed a series of experiments to characterize the reproductive performance of crosses between R. microplus from Australia, Africa and America and the genetic diversity of strains from Australia, Asia, Africa and America.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Results]: The results showed that the crosses between Australian and Argentinean or Mozambican strains of boophilid ticks are infertile while crosses between Argentinean and Mozambican strains are fertile. These results showed that tick strains from Africa (Mozambique) and America (Argentina) are the same species, while ticks from Australia may actually represent a separate species. The genetic analysis of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA and microsatellite loci were not conclusive when taken separately, but provided evidence that Australian tick strains were genetically different from Asian, African and American strains.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Conclusion]: The results reported herein support the hypothesis that at least two different species share the name R. microplus. These species could be redefined as R. microplus (Canestrini, 1887) (for American and African strains) and probably the old R. australis Fuller, 1899 (for Australian strains), which needs to be redescribed. However, experiments with a larger number of tick strains from different geographic locations are needed to corroborate these results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by ICTTD-3, financed by the International Cooperation Program of the European Union, coordination action project No. 510561, the Consejería de Educación y Ciencia, JCCM, Spain (project PAI06-0046-5285) (to JF), the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq (to MBL), the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientícas y Técnicas de Argentina (PIP 2058) and INTA Rafaela (TCP 426100) (to AJM, AAG and CT). V. Naranjo was funded by Junta de Comunidades de Castilla–La Mancha (JCCM), Spain.en_US
dc.format.extent755700 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplusen_US
dc.subjectCattle ticken_US
dc.subjectR. microplus strainsen_US
dc.subjectBiogeographical separationen_US
dc.subjectDifferent boophilid speciesen_US
dc.subjectReproductive performance of crossesen_US
dc.titleAllopatric speciation in ticks: genetic and reproductive divergence between geographic strains of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplusen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2148-9-46-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-46en_US
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.contributor.funderConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Brasil)-
dc.contributor.funderJunta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha-
dc.contributor.funderConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (Argentina)-
dc.contributor.funderInstituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (España)-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000780es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003593es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002923es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010687es_ES
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011698es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid19243585-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IREC) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Labruna_et_el_BMC_Evolutionary_Biology_9_2009.pdfMain text file737,99 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
1471-2148-9-46-s1.xlsSuppl. info24 kBMicrosoft ExcelVisualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

20
checked on 16-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

94
checked on 19-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

87
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

608
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

296
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.