English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/118278
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Role of buckwheat diet on rats as prebiotic and healthy food

AuthorsPréstamo, Guadalupe ; Pedrazuela, A.; Peñas, Elena ; Lasunción, M. A.; Arroyo, G.
KeywordsBifidobacteria
Cholesterol
Lactobacillus
Prebiotic
Functional food
Buckwheat
Issue Date2003
PublisherElsevier
CitationNutrition Research 23: 803- 814 (2003)
AbstractThe objective of this research is to assess if the buckwheat (BW) could behaves as a prebiotic and be considered as healthy food. Buckwheat is a nutritional food, rich in essential aminoacids, fatty acids, vitamins B1 and B2 and also a good source of minerals, which may produce beneficial effects on health. For our investigation, a total of twenty, 12-week-old Wistar Hannover rats was used and the animals were fed for 30 days. The body-weight was lower in the BW diet than control with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). No significant differences were found in the weight of the organs (liver, spleen, kidney and heart). Microbial analysis and detection were carded out on Enterobacteria, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacilus and Bifidobacteria in the rat's intestine. The results showed an increase of aerobic mesophilic and lactic acid bacteria content in the BW diet when compared to control, with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). In the BW diet, we also observed a slight decrease of Enterobectaria and less pathogenic bacteria. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius and Bifidobacterium infantis were found in both diets, but only Lactobacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium spp and Bifidobacterium lactis were found in addition in the buckwheat diet. All these results confirm that BW could possibly be considered as a prebiotic product. Glucose content was measured in the blood. Uric acid, total protein, HDL and LDL lipids, cholesterol, triglycerides, alkaline phosphatase and mineral content were also measured in the serum. The glucose and uric acid content were similar in both diets and no significant differences were observed for the total proteins, albumin and mineral content. The alkaline phosphatase decreased in the BW diet, but no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) was found when compared to control. Buckwheat could as well be considered as a healthy food due to the diminution on total cholesterol with significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) when compared to control. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/118278
DOI10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00074-5
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(03)00074-5
issn: 0271-5317
Appears in Collections:(ICTAN) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.