Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/117011
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-López, Rafael-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez de la Puente, Josué-
dc.contributor.authorGangoso, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorSoriguer, Ramón C.-
dc.contributor.authorFiguerola, Jordi-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T09:17:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T09:17:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1111/jvec.12127-
dc.identifierissn: 1948-7134-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Vector Ecology 40: 11- 15 (2015)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/117011-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 The Society for Vector Ecology. The barcoding of life initiative provides a universal molecular tool to distinguish animal species based on the amplification and sequencing of a fragment of the subunit 1 of the cytochrome oxidase (COI) gene. Obtaining good quality DNA for barcoding purposes is a limiting factor, especially in studies conducted on small-sized samples or those requiring the maintenance of the organism as a voucher. In this study, we compared the number of positive amplifications and the quality of the sequences obtained using DNA extraction methods that also differ in their economic costs and time requirements and we applied them for the genetic characterization of louse flies. Four DNA extraction methods were studied: chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, HotShot procedure, Qiagen DNeasy® Tissue and Blood Kit and DNA Kit Maxwell® 16LEV. All the louse flies were morphologically identified as Ornithophila gestroi and a single COI-based haplotype was identified. The number of positive amplifications did not differ significantly among DNA extraction procedures. However, the quality of the sequences was significantly lower for the case of the chloroform/isoamyl alcohol procedure with respect to the rest of methods tested here. These results may be useful for the genetic characterization of louse flies, leaving most of the remaining insect as a voucher.-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_EN
dc.subjectParasites-
dc.subjectOrnithophila gestroi-
dc.subjectHippoboscids-
dc.subjectCOI-
dc.subjectBarcoding of life-
dc.subjectDNA extraction methods-
dc.titleComparison of manual and semi-automatic DNA extraction protocols for the barcoding characterization of hematophagous louse flies (Diptera: Hippoboscidae)-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jvec.12127-
dc.embargo.terms2016-06-05-
dc.date.updated2015-06-23T09:17:28Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeartículo-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on 18-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

27
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

551
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

897
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.