English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/116101
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLenormand, Maxime-
dc.contributor.authorPicornell, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorCantu Ros, O. G.-
dc.contributor.authorTugores, Maria Antonia-
dc.contributor.authorLouail, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorHerranz, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorBarthelemy, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorFrías-Martínez, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorRamasco, José J.-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105184-
dc.identifierissn: 1932-6203-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 9(8): e105184 (2014)-
dc.description.abstractThe pervasive use of new mobile devices has allowed a better characterization in space and time of human concentrations and mobility in general. Besides its theoretical interest, describing mobility is of great importance for a number of practical applications ranging from the forecast of disease spreading to the design of new spaces in urban environments. While classical data sources, such as surveys or census, have a limited level of geographical resolution (e.g., districts, municipalities, counties are typically used) or are restricted to generic workdays or weekends, the data coming from mobile devices can be precisely located both in time and space. Most previous works have used a single data source to study human mobility patterns. Here we perform instead a cross-check analysis by comparing results obtained with data collected from three different sources: Twitter, census, and cell phones. The analysis is focused on the urban areas of Barcelona and Madrid, for which data of the three types is available. We assess the correlation between the datasets on different aspects: the spatial distribution of people concentration, the temporal evolution of people density, and the mobility patterns of individuals. Our results show that the three data sources are providing comparable information. Even though the representativeness of Twitter geolocated data is lower than that of mobile phone and census data, the correlations between the population density profiles and mobility patterns detected by the three datasets are close to one in a grid with cells of 2×2 and 1×1 square kilometers. This level of correlation supports the feasibility of interchanging the three data sources at the spatio-temporal scales considered.-
dc.description.sponsorshipPartial financial support has been received from the Spanish Ministry of Economy (MINECO) and FEDER (EU) under projects MODASS (FIS2011-24785) and INTENSE@COSYP (FIS2012-30634), and from the EU Commission through projects EUNOIA, LASAGNE and INSIGHT. ML acknowledges funding from the Conselleria d'Educació, Cultura i Universitats of the Government of the Balearic Islands, and JJR from the Ramón y Cajal program of MINECO.-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.titleCross-Checking Different Sources of Mobility Information-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Commission-
dc.contributor.funderGovern de les Illes Balears-
Appears in Collections:(IFISC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sources_mobility_Information_Lenormand.pdf1,63 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.