Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/115708
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
SHARE CORE BASE | |
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE | |
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Boada, Jordi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanmartí, Neus | - |
dc.contributor.author | Selden, Rebecca L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lucas Forcadell, Arturo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez, Marta M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Alcoverro, Teresa | - |
dc.contributor.author | Romero, Javier | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-25T10:21:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-25T10:21:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Experiemntal Marine Biology and Ecology 471 : 17-22 (2015) | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-0981 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/115708 | - |
dc.description | 6 páginas, 3 figuras,3 tablas. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | Measuring the strength of trophic interactions in marine systems has been central to our understanding of community structuring. Sea urchin tethering has been the method of choice to evaluate rates of predation in marine benthic ecosystems. As standardly practiced, this method involves piercing the urchin test, potentially introducing significantmethodological artifacts thatmay influence survival or detection by predators.Herewe assess possible artifacts of tethering comparing invasive (pierced) and non-invasive tethering techniques using the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Specifically, we looked at how degree of confinement and high water temperature (first order artifacts) and predator guild and size of the prey (second order artifacts) affect the survival and/or detectability of pierced urchins. Our results show that first order artifacts only arise when pierced sea urchins are placed in sheltered bayswith confined waters, especiallywhenwater temperature reaches extremely high levels. Prey detectability did not increase in pierced sea urchins for the most common predators. Also, test piercing did not alter the preferences of predators for given prey sizes. Weconclude that the standard tethering technique is a robust method to test relative rates of sea urchin predation. However, local conditions could increasemortality of the tethered urchin in sheltered bays or in very high temperature regimes. Under these conditions, adequate pierced controls (within predator exclusions) need to be included in assays to evaluate artifactual sources of mortality. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (projects CTM2010- 22273-C02-01-02 and CTM2013-48027-C03-R) and the Spanish National Research Council (project CSIC-201330E062) funded this research. The Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation supported J. B. (scholarship BES-2011-043630). | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | es_ES |
dc.rights | openAccess | es_ES |
dc.subject | Experimental ecology | es_ES |
dc.subject | Tagging | es_ES |
dc.subject | Paracentrotus lividus | es_ES |
dc.subject | Predation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Prey detection | es_ES |
dc.subject | Prey mortality | es_ES |
dc.title | Evaluating potential artifacts of tethering techniques to estimate predation on sea urchins | es_ES |
dc.type | artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.05.011 | - |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2015.05.011 | es_ES |
dc.relation.csic | Sí | es_ES |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | es_ES |
item.openairetype | artículo | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Aparece en las colecciones: | (CEAB) Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluating potential artifacts of tethering JEMBE.pdf | 364,14 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
16
checked on 19-mar-2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
17
checked on 19-feb-2024
Page view(s)
369
checked on 28-mar-2024
Download(s)
280
checked on 28-mar-2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.