English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/112257
Compartir / Impacto:
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 2 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)

Comparison of three high-flow single-stage impaction-based air samplers for bacteria quantification: DUO SAS SUPER 360, SAMPL'AIR and SPIN AIR

Autor Sánchez-Muñoz, Marta; Muñoz-Vicente, María; Cobas, Guillermo; Portela, Raquel ; Amils, Ricardo; Sánchez, Benigno
Fecha de publicación 2012
Citación Analytical Methods 4: 399- 405 (2012)
ResumenIndoor Air Quality (IAQ) can be significantly deteriorated by high levels of bioaerosols that may cause adverse health effects in building occupants. There is no standard method for the quantification of this kind of pollutants and several protocols and sampling devices are used. The aim of this work was to compare three commonly used portable air samplers available in the market. DUO SAS SUPER 360, SAMPL'AIR and SPIN AIR units were tested simultaneously for bacteria quantification in a laboratory room in realistic conditions. The results obtained showed that the SPIN AIR unit was the most precise and recovered a higher amount of colony-forming units; consequently this sampler seems to be better for indoor-air bioaerosol concentration measurements. Additionally, positive-hole correction can be avoided due to the SPIN AIR sampling head rotation mechanism. The mean bacterial concentration measured by the other two models was not significantly different. However, due to the high dispersion of the DUO SAS SUPER 360 results, many repetitions are necessary to obtain a reliable measure with this device. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012.
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/112257
Identificadoresdoi: 10.1039/c1ay05562c
issn: 1759-9660
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICP) Artículos
(CBM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
R_Amils_Comparision.pdf343,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Mostrar el registro completo

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.