English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/112201
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:


Electoral competition through issue selection

AuthorsAragonés, Enriqueta ; Castanheira, Micael; Giani, Marco
Issue Date1-Jan-2015
PublisherBlackwell Publishing
CitationAmerican Journal of Political Science 59(1): 71-90 (2015)
Abstract© 2014, Midwest Political Science Association. Politics must address multiple problems simultaneously. In an ideal world, political competition would force parties to adopt priorities that reflect the voters' true concerns. In reality, parties can run their campaigns in such a way as to manipulate voters' priorities. This phenomenon, known as priming, may allow parties to underinvest in solving the issues that they intend to mute. We develop a model of endogenous issue ownership in which two vote-seeking parties (a) invest in policy quality to increase the value of their platform and (b) choose a communication strategy to prime voters. We identify novel feedback between communication and investment. In particular, we find that stronger priming effects can constrain parties to invest more resources in all issues. We also identify the conditions under which parties prefer to focus on their >historical issues> or to engage in >issue stealing.>
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12120
Identifiersdoi: 10.1111/ajps.12120
issn: 1540-5907
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ACG_AJPS_2014-03-11-final.pdf496,55 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show full item record
Review this work

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.