English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/110941
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Seed dispersal networks in the Galápagos and the consequences of alien plant invasions

AuthorsHeleno, Rubén H.; Olesen, Jens M.; Nogales, Manuel ; Vargas, Pablo ; Traveset, Anna
KeywordsMutualistic interactions
Frugivory
Oceanic islands
Ornithochory
Saurochory
Exotics
Issue Date2013
PublisherRoyal Society (Great Britain)
CitationProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280(1750): 20122112 (2013)
AbstractAlien plants are a growing threat to the Galápagos unique biota. We evaluated the impact of alien plants on eight seed dispersal networks from two islands of the archipelago. Nearly 10 000 intact seeds from 58 species were recovered from the droppings of 18 bird and reptile dispersers. The most dispersed invaders were Lantana camara, Rubus niveus and Psidium guajava, the latter two likely benefiting from an asynchronous fruit production with most native plants, which facilitate their consumption and spread. Lava lizards dispersed the seeds of 27 species, being the most important dispersers, followed by small ground finch, two mockingbirds, the giant tortoise and two insectivorous birds. Most animals dispersed alien seeds, but these formed a relatively small proportion of the interactions. Nevertheless, the integration of aliens was higher in the island that has been invaded for longest, suggesting a time-lag between alien plant introductions and their impacts on seed dispersal networks. Alien plants become more specialized with advancing invasion, favouring more simplified plant and disperser communities. However, only habitat type significantly affected the overall network structure. Alien plants were dispersed via two pathways: dryfruited plants were preferentially dispersed by finches, while fleshy fruited species were mostly dispersed by other birds and reptiles. © 2012 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2112
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/110941
DOI10.1098/rspb.2012.2112
Identifiersdoi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2112
issn: 0962-8452
Appears in Collections:(IPNA) Artículos
(RJB) Artículos
(IMEDEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Heleno-PRSL-2013-v280-p20122112.pdf426,63 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.