English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/110802
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Costs and benefits of capsaicin-mediated control of gut retention in dispersers of wild chilies

AuthorsTewksbury, Joshua J.; Levey, Douglas J.; Huizinga, Meribeth; Haak, David C.; Traveset, Anna
KeywordsFruit-frugivore interactions
Fruit secondary metabolites
Frugivory
Elaenia parvirostris
Chilies
Capsicum chacoense
Capsicum annuum
Capsaicin capsaicinoids
Gut retention
Scarification
Seed germination
Toxostoma curvirostre
Issue DateJan-2008
PublisherEcological Society of America
CitationEcology 89(1): 107-117 (2008)
AbstractA fundamental way in which animal-dispersed plants can influence the viability and distribution of dispersed seeds is through control of retention time in the guts of dispersers. Using two species of wild chilies and their dispersers, we examined how chemical and physical properties of fruits and seeds mediate this interaction. Capsicum chacoense is polymorphic for pungency, occurs in Bolivia, and is dispersed mostly by elaenias. Capsicum annuum is not polymorphic, occurs in Arizona (USA), and is dispersed mostly by thrashers. We first tested whether capsaicin, the substance responsible for the pungency of chilies, affects gut retention time of seeds in primary dispersers. Capsaicin slowed gut passage of seeds but did so in a manner that differed greatly between bird species because the constipative effects of capsaicin occurred only after an 80-minute time lag. Elaenias in Bolivia held only 6% of C. chacoense seeds for >80 minutes, whereas thrashers in Arizona held 78% of C. annuum seeds for >80 minutes. Next we examined the effects of retention time on seed viability and germination. Increased retention resulted in a greater proportion of seeds germinating in C. annuum, had no effects on non-pungent C. chacoense, and had negative effects on pungent C. chacoense. These divergent effects are explained by differences in seed coat morphology: seed coats of pungent C. chacoense are 10-12% thinner than those of the other two types of seeds. Thus, longer retention times damaged seeds with the thinnest seed coats. In C. annuum, seed viability remained high regardless of retention time, but germination increased with retention, suggesting a role for scarification. Thus, in C. annuum, fruit chemistry appears well matched with seed morphology and disperser physiology: capsaicin extends gut retention for most seeds, resulting in greater seed scarification and higher germination rates. Increased retention of pungent C. chacoense seeds is detrimental, but because the primary consumers have short retention times, capsaicin slows only a small proportion of seeds, minimizing negative effects. These results illustrate the importance of context in studies of fruit secondary metabolites. The same chemical can have different impacts on plant fitness depending on its morphological, physiological, and ecological context. © 2008 by the Ecological Society of America.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0445.1
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/110802
DOI10.1890/07-0445.1
Identifiersdoi: 10.1890/07-0445.1
issn: 0012-9658
Appears in Collections:(IMEDEA) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tewksbury-Ecology-1008-v89-n1-p107.pdf1,68 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.