English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/110361
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection

AuthorsGarcía-Navas, Vicente CSIC ORCID; Ferrer, Esperanza S.; Bueno-Enciso, Javier; Barrientos, Rafael CSIC ORCID CVN; Sanz, Juan José CSIC ORCID ; Ortego, Joaquín CSIC ORCID
KeywordsBreeding density
Cyanistes caeruleus
Fitness components
Promiscuity
Realized reproductive success
Variance in male fitness
Issue Date2-Dec-2014
PublisherOxford University Press
CitationBehavioral Ecology 25(1): 228-238 (2014)
AbstractThe frequency of extrapair paternity within populations has been hypothesized to be related to ecological and social factors, which in turn can determine the impact of extrapair paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection. Here, we use the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus as study species to assess both issues. In particular, we analyze patterns of extrapair paternity in 12 nest-box plots that greatly vary in local population size, level of nest-box aggregation, and breeding density. We found a significant positive relationship between extrapair paternity rate and local population size. Within study plots, neither local breeding density nor synchrony had an effect on the occurrence of extrapair paternity. Most extrapair males engaged in extrapair copulations with neighbouring females, probably in order to avoid paternity losses. Individuals that travelled larger distances to gain extrapair paternity likely did so because the social females of most of them had not yet begun their fertile period and, thus, within-pair paternity was not at risk. Variance in male reproductive success was mostly produced by variance in within-pair success, which in turn was primarily influenced by mate quality. Extrapair success contributed substantially to variance in male reproductive success (26%), but its effect was smaller than expected. Bateman gradients showed positive slopes (βss) for both males and females. However, the lack of a positive covariance between within-pair and extrapair success suggests that the effect of extrapair paternity on the strength of sexual selection was limited. This fact can be explained by the spatial distribution of extrapair fertilizations, which points to the absence of directional female mating preferences in this study system and, thus, not leading to “big winners” and “big losers.”
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art111
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/110361
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art111
ISSN1045-2249
E-ISSN1465-7279
Appears in Collections:(MNCN) Artículos
(IREC) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Behavioral Ecology 25(1) 228-238 (2014).pdf3,8 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.