English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/109137
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 16 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Pub MebCentral Ver citas en PubMed Central  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar EndNote (RIS)
Título

Harbor networks as introduction gateways: contrasting distribution patterns of native and introduced ascidians

Autor López-Legentil, S.; Legentil, Miquel L.; Erwin, Patrick M.; Turon, Xavier
Palabras clave Distribution
Diversity
Tunicates
Introduced species
Barcoding
Artificial substrates
Fecha de publicación 2014
EditorSpringer
Citación Biological Invasions : 17:1623–1638 (2015)
ResumenHarbors and marinas are well known gateways for species introductions in marine environments but little work has been done to ascertain relationships between species diversity, harbor type, and geographic distance to uncover patterns of secondary spread. Here, we sampled ascidians from 32 harbors along ca. 300 km of theNWMediterranean coast and investigated patterns of distribution and spread related to harbor type (marina, fishing, commercial) and geographic location using multivariate techniques. In total, 28 ascidians were identified at the species level and another 9 at the genus level based on morphology and genetic barcoding. Eight species were assigned to introduced forms, 15 were given native status and 5 were classified as cryptogenic. Aplidium accarense was reported for the first time in the Mediterranean Sea and was especially abundant in 23 of the harbors. Introduced and cryptogenic species were abundant in most of the surveyed harbors, while native forms were rare and restricted to a few harbors. Significant differences in the distribution of ascidians according to harbor type and latitudinal position were observed. These differences were due to the distribution of introduced species. We obtained a significant correlation between geographic distance and ascidian composition, indicating that closely located harbors shared more ascidian species among them. This study showed that harbors act as dispersal strongholds for introduced species, with native species only appearing sporadically, and that harbor type and geographic location should also be considered when developing management plans to constrain the spread of nonindigenous species in highly urbanized coastlines.
Descripción 16 páginas, 6 tablas, 4 figuras
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0821-z
URI http://hdl.handle.net/10261/109137
DOI10.1007/s10530-014-0821-z
ISSN1387-3547
Aparece en las colecciones: (CEAB) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
López-Legentil et al 2015 Biol Inv.pdf1,31 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 



NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.