English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/10869
Compartir / Impacto:
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Citado 50 veces en Web of Knowledge®  |  Pub MebCentral Ver citas en PubMed Central  |  Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL

Behavior of selected priority organic pollutants in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: A preliminary screening

AutorMatamoros, Víctor; Puigagut, Jaume; García, Joan; Bayona Termens, Josep María
Palabras claveConstructed wetland
European water framework directive
Priority pollutants
Gravel bed accumulation
Pollutant injection
Removal efficiency
Fecha de publicación27-jun-2007
CitaciónChemosphere 69(9): 1374-1380 (2007)
ResumenA discrete injection experiment was carried out in a constructed wetland to evaluate the behavior of selected priority pollutants. A horizontal subsurface flow pilot plant located in the NE of Spain was selected for this study. A total of eight European Priority Pollutants listed in the Water Framework Directive were considered, including a commonly used herbicide (mecoprop). The pollutants encompassed a variety of chemical classes and physicochemical properties. They included organochlorine, organophosphorus, phenols, chloroacetanilides, triazine, phenoxycarboxylic acid and phenylurea pesticides. A time series of composite effluent samples and discrete gravel bed samples from the wetland were analyzed. Response curves for all the pollutants injected from effluent concentrations were obtained and compared with the tracer (clofibric acid). On the basis of an analysis of the samples taken 21 days after the injection, priority pollutants were classified into four groups according to their removal efficiency. These groups were (i) the highly efficiently removed (>90%), namely lindane, pentachlorophenol, endosulfan and pentachlorobenzene; (ii) the efficiently removed (80–90%), namely alachlor and chlorpyriphos; (iii) poorly removed (20%), namely mecoprop and simazine; and (iv) recalcitrant to elimination, namely clofibric acid and diuron. Taking into account the poor accumulation of the injected contaminants in the gravel bed (0–20%), biodegradation and plant uptake are postulated as the most likely elimination pathways for the pollutants.
Descripción7 pages, 4 tables, 2 figures.-- PMID: 17590410 [PubMed].-- Printed version published Nov 2007.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.012
Aparece en las colecciones: (IDAEA) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro completo

NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.