Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/108075
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorEdwards Schachter, Mónica E.-
dc.contributor.authorTams, Svenja-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-26T10:29:24Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-26T10:29:24Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citation1st Social Frontiers Research Conference (2013)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/108075-
dc.descriptionTrabajo presentado al 1st Social Frontiers Research Conference: "The next edge of social innovation research" celebrado en London (UK) del 14 al 15 de Noviembre de 2013.-
dc.description.abstractEmpowerment and community participation have been recognized as means and outcomes of social innovations. In the last decade, these ideas have been reflected in the growing movement of formal and informal ‘Living Labs’ (LLs). They are emerging as a new model of organizing collaborative innovation processes with the participation of business, government and civil actors. LLs constitute knowledge hubs that are opening a contested terrain in which habitual distinctions between ‘producers’ and ‘users’ of knowledge are increasingly blurred. This chapter investigates actors’ perceptions about power and knowledge relationships in a Living Lab context. We present an in-depth study case, complemented with information of 120 Living Labs obtained from the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) website and other secondary sources. Our findings show that participation and empowerment are constrained by relational, structural and cultural barriers. Understanding power and knowledge dynamics in innovation processes entails broadening our analytical and practical lens to consider knowledge asymmetries and struggles between ‘instru- mental’ and ‘transformative’ rationalities. Findings suggest that the governance of LLs and similar models of collaborative innovation needs to consider how the power dynamics of a given context can enable or constrain the empowerment of people as ‘users’ and ‘co-creators’ of knowledge. .-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectParticipation-
dc.subjectEmpowerment-
dc.subjectLiving labs-
dc.subjectSocial innovation-
dc.subjectKnowledge-
dc.subjectBarriers-
dc.subjectCommunity-driven innovation-
dc.titleHow empowering is social innovation? Identifying barriers to participation in community driven innovation-
dc.typecomunicación de congreso-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.nesta.org.uk/event/social-frontiers-
dc.date.updated2014-11-26T10:29:24Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794es_ES
item.openairetypecomunicación de congreso-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (INGENIO) Comunicaciones congresos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

347
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

68
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.