Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/107546
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMartínez, M. E.-
dc.contributor.authorCarro Travieso, Mª Dolores-
dc.contributor.authorCantalapiedra-Hijar, G.-
dc.contributor.authorRanilla, María José-
dc.contributor.authorYáñez Ruiz, David R.-
dc.contributor.authorMolina Alcaide, E.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-13T11:03:43Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-13T11:03:43Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationOptions Méditerranées A 99: 109-114 (2011)-
dc.identifier.issn2219-7281-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/107546-
dc.description6 páginas, 3 tablas.-
dc.descriptionMartínez M.E., Carro M.D., Cantalapiedra-Híjar G., Ranilla M.J., Yáñez Ruiz D.R., Molina Alcaide E. Effect of forage type and forage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation in single-flow continuous-culture and Rusitec fermenters. In : Ranilla M.J. (ed.), Carro M.D. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Challenging strategies to promote the sheep and goat sector in the current global context. Zaragoza : CIHEAM / CSIC / Universidad de León / FAO, 2011. p. 109-114 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 99)-
dc.description.abstractEight single-flow continuous-culture (SFCC) and 8 Rusitec fermenters were used to compare the ruminal fermentation of 4 diets with forage:concentrate ratios (F:C) of 70:30 or 30:70 and alfalfa or grass hay as forage. Four rumen fistulated goats and 4 rumen fistulated sheep were used as donors for SFCC and Rusitec fermenters, respectively. There were no differences (P>0.05) between fermentation systems (FS) in the daily production of ammonia-N and molar proportions of propionate and isobutyrate, but the other fermentation variables were affected (P<0.05) by the FS. Dilution rate, solids retention time, dry matter digestibility, pH and molar proportions of butyrate, isovalerate and valerate were lower (P¿0.005) in SFCC than in Rusitec fermenters, whereas digestibility of neutral-detergent fibre and acid-detergent fibre, daily production of volatile fatty acids, molar proportion of acetate and acetate:propionate ratio were lower (P<0.001) in Rusitec compared with SFCC fermenters. Interactions (P<0.05) FS x F:C and FS x type of forage were detected for most of the fermentation variables, indicating differences between SFCC and Rusitec fermenters in detecting the effects of F:C ratio and type of forage on ruminal fermentation parameters.-
dc.publisherCentre international de hautes études agronomiques méditerranéennes-
dc.rightsclosedAccess-
dc.subjectRusitec-
dc.subjectForages: concentrate ratio-
dc.subjectRuminal fermentation-
dc.subjectSingle-flow continuous - culture fermenters-
dc.titleEffect of forage type and forage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation in single-flow continuous-culture and Rusitec fermenters-
dc.typeartículo-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=801543#prettyPhoto[iframes]/0/-
dc.date.updated2014-11-13T11:03:43Z-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
dc.language.rfc3066eng-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEZ) Artículos
(IGM) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

225
checked on 19-abr-2024

Download(s)

34
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.