English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/10542
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Ver citas en Google académico
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar otros formatos: Exportar EndNote (RIS)Exportar bibText (RIS)Exportar csv (RIS)
Título

Individual versus group strategy-proofness: when do they coincide?

AutorBarberà, Salvador; Berga, Dolors; Moreno, Bernardo
Palabras claveStrategy-proofness
Group strategy-proofness
k-size strategy-proofness
Sequential inclusion
Single-peaked preferences
Single-dipped preferences
Separable preferences
Fecha de publicación4-feb-2009
SerieUFAE and IAE Working Papers ; 761.09
ResumenA social choice function is group strategy-proof on a domain if no group of agents can manipulate its final outcome to their own benefit by declaring false preferences on that domain. Group strategy-proofness is a very attractive requirement of incentive compatibility. But in many cases it is hard or impossible to find nontrivial social choice functions satisfying even the weakest condition of individual strategy-proofness. However, there are a number of economically significant domains where interesting rules satisfying individual strategy-proofness can be defined, and for some of them, all these rules turn out to also satisfy the stronger requirement of group strategy-proofness. This is the case, for example, when preferences are single-peaked or single-dipped. In other cases, this equivalence does not hold. We provide sufficient conditions defining domains of preferences guaranteeing that individual and group strategy-proofness are equivalent for all rules defined on these domains. Our results extend to intermediate versions of strategy-proofness, defined to exclude manipulations by small group of agents. They also provide guidelines on how to restrict the ranges of functions defined on domains that only satisfy our condition partially. Finally, we provide a partial answer regarding the necessity of our conditions.
Descripción32 pages, 2 figures.-- JEL Classification Number: D71.
Versión del editorhttp://pareto.uab.es/wp/2009/76109.pdf
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/10542
Aparece en las colecciones: (IAE) Informes y documentos de trabajo
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
76109.pdf330,92 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.