English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/10542
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Individual versus group strategy-proofness: when do they coincide?

AuthorsBarberà, Salvador; Berga, Dolors; Moreno, Bernardo
KeywordsStrategy-proofness
Group strategy-proofness
k-size strategy-proofness
Sequential inclusion
Single-peaked preferences
Single-dipped preferences
Separable preferences
Issue Date4-Feb-2009
SeriesUFAE and IAE Working Papers ; 761.09
AbstractA social choice function is group strategy-proof on a domain if no group of agents can manipulate its final outcome to their own benefit by declaring false preferences on that domain. Group strategy-proofness is a very attractive requirement of incentive compatibility. But in many cases it is hard or impossible to find nontrivial social choice functions satisfying even the weakest condition of individual strategy-proofness. However, there are a number of economically significant domains where interesting rules satisfying individual strategy-proofness can be defined, and for some of them, all these rules turn out to also satisfy the stronger requirement of group strategy-proofness. This is the case, for example, when preferences are single-peaked or single-dipped. In other cases, this equivalence does not hold. We provide sufficient conditions defining domains of preferences guaranteeing that individual and group strategy-proofness are equivalent for all rules defined on these domains. Our results extend to intermediate versions of strategy-proofness, defined to exclude manipulations by small group of agents. They also provide guidelines on how to restrict the ranges of functions defined on domains that only satisfy our condition partially. Finally, we provide a partial answer regarding the necessity of our conditions.
Description32 pages, 2 figures.-- JEL Classification Number: D71.
Publisher version (URL)http://pareto.uab.es/wp/2009/76109.pdf
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/10542
Appears in Collections:(IAE) Informes y documentos de trabajo
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
76109.pdf330,92 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.