English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/10238
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Estimation of fuel moisture content by inversion of radiative transfer models to simulate equivalent water thickness and dry matter content: Analysis at leaf and canopy level

AuthorsRiaño, David ; Vaughan, Patrick J.; Chuvieco, Emilio; Zarco-Tejada, Pablo J. ; Ustin, S. L.
KeywordsDry matter (DM),
Equivalent water thickness (EWT)
Fire danger
Fuel moisture content (FMC)
Infinite reflectance
Model inversion
Radiative transfer
Issue Date2005
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
CitationIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 43, No. 4, 819-826
AbstractFire danger models identify fuel moisture content (FMC) of live vegetation as a critical variable, since it affects fire ignition and propagation. FMC can be calculated by dividing equivalent water thickness (EWT) by dry matter content (DM). The “leaf optical properties spectra” (PROSPECT) model was inverted to estimate EWT and DM separately using the Leaf Optical Properties Experiment (LOPEX) database, based on 490 measurements of leaf optical and biochemical properties. DM estimations were poor when leaf samples were fresh ( 2 = 0 38). Results of a sensitivity analysis conducted on the spectral response of samples demonstrated that water absorption masks the effects of DM on the spectral response. This causes a poor estimation of FMC ( 2 = 033), even though EWT estimation was good ( 2 = 094). However, DM of dry samples was accurately estimated ( 2 = 0 84), since no water was present. FMC estimation in fresh leaf material improved considerably ( 2 = 089) by accounting for DM in fresh samples ( 2 = 071), when a constant species-dependent DM value is used. A similar approach was taken on a canopy level by linking the PROSPECT leaf model with the Lillesaeter infinitive reflectance canopy model using data from laboratory measurements under controlled conditions. As expected, results indicate grater difficulty to estimate DM and FMC on a canopy level, although similar trends were observed. DM estimation improved from 2 = 012 to 2 = 039 when considering measurements of dry samples, which when used for FMC estimation, correlations increase from 2 = 062 to 2 = 0 81. Therefore, DM can be accurately estimated only when plant material is dry, and it is a necessary measurement in order to estimate FMC accurately. DM remains stable over annual time periods although lower values are expected during the drought season. However, time variations in DM are smaller than DM variations among species. Because there is also a decrease in water content with low EWT values during phenologically dormant periods, multitemporal data could be used to estimate FMC. Further research must be applied on real canopies to confirm these results.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.843316
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/10238
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.843316
ISSN0196-2892
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.