English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/102158
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

What factors affect the visibility of Argentinean publications in humanities and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidence beyond the geographic realm of research.

AuthorsChinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida ; Miguel, Sandra; Moya Anegón, Félix de
KeywordsBibliometrics
Publication patterns
Argentina
Citation
Scientific collaboration
Scopus
Language of publication
Evaluation criteria
Journals
Topics of national scope
Topics of global scope
Issue Date2015
PublisherSpringer
CitationScientometrics 102(1): 789-810 (2015)
AbstractArgentina´s patterns of publication in the humanities and social sciences were studied for the period 2003-2012, using the Scopus database and distinguishing the geographic realm of the research. The results indicate that “topics of national scope” have grown and gained international visibility. They can be broadly characterized as having Spanish as the language of publication, and a marked preference for single authorship; in contrast, the publication of “global topics”, not geographically limited, characteristically have English as the language of divulgation, and institutional collaboration is stronger and more consolidated. Citation is apparently not determined only by the geographic realm of research, but also by language of publication, co-authorship, and the profiles of the journals where published. These results could contribute to constructive reflection upon publishing policy. The existence of a community of journals that tolerates biased patterns may make researchers echo and perpetuate poor practices, constructing or adapting the channels of communication. Such results also prove useful as a point of reference when evaluation criteria are elaborated by scientific committees, as unsupervised promotion and evaluation patterns could become based on local or overly subjective precepts, disregarding the disciplinary practices of the international scientific community.
Description"This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Scientometrics. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4”.
Publisher version (URL)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-014-1414-4
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/102158
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4
ISSN0138-9130
E-ISSN1588-2861
Appears in Collections:(CCHS-IPP) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
What_factors_affect_visibility_Argentina_SSH.pdf2,18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.