English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/102141
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Breeding birds along a vegetation gradient in a Mediterranean landscape: Contrasting patterns in spatial diversity

AuthorsZangari, L.; Ferraguti, Martina; Battisti, C.; Luiselli, L.; Bologna, M.A.
Issue Date2013
PublisherUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie
CitationVie et Milieu, 63(3-4): 121-126 (2013)
AbstractDiversity may be evaluated by adopting different hierarchical approaches. In this study, we analyzed the breeding bird communities of five habitats spatially distributed along a gradient of landscape vegetation in central Italy. We highlighted their structural differences at three hierarchical diversity metrics (α-, β- and γ-diversity). The beech forest showed the highest averaged values in terms of both abundance and species richness (α–diversity), as well as in terms of Shannon index, while chestnut and oak woods showed the lowest values. Along the vegetation gradient we observed an inverse pattern of spatial diversity from the Mediterranean sclerophilic wood to the temperate and mesophilic beech forest. The beech forest was very rich at the point count scale (higher α-diversity) but had the lower value both in β- and γ-diversity; in contrast, the sclerophilic wood had a low α-diversity (point-scale) and the higher β- and γ-diversity values. The beech forest showed a low β-diversity (low habitat heterogeneity at the vegetation patch level), but due to the higher tree diameter and the related niche availability, it showed a high α-diversity (at point-scale). The sclerophilic wood, which was more simply structured, had a low α-diversity at point-scale, but a high β-diversity at the vegetation patch level, due to a high heterogeneity. This study demonstrates that patterns of diversity may be complex at different hierarchic levels. If conservation and landscape planning strategies are promoted at landscape scale, objectives should be carefully specified in terms of component of species diversity (α-, β-, γ-level).
Publisher version (URL)http://www.obs-banyuls.fr/Viemilieu/index.php/volume-63-2013/63-issue-3-4/633-4-article-1.html
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/102141
ISSN0240-8759
Appears in Collections:(EBD) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
633-4-01-Zangari.pdf1,47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.