Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/9769
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Attacking Chickpea and Their In Planta Interactions with Rhizobia and Phytopathogenic Fungi

AutorCastillo, Pablo CSIC ORCID ; Navas Cortés, Juan Antonio ; Landa, Blanca B. CSIC ORCID ; Jiménez-Díaz, Rafael M. CSIC ; Vovlas, Nicola
Palabras claveChickpeas
Cicer arietinum
Plant-parasitic nematodes
Root-knot nematodes
Meloidogyne spp.
Root-lesion nematodes
Pratylenchus spp.
Cyst-forming nematodes
Heterodera spp.
Reniform nematode
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Pathogenicity
Disease management
Interactions
Fecha de publicaciónjun-2008
EditorAmerican Phytopathological Society
CitaciónPlant Disease 92(6): 840-853 (2008)
ResumenChickpea (Cicer arietinum) is a cool-season food legume second in importance as a pulse crop in the world after beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). It is an important protein source in many regions of the semi-arid tropics. Chickpea is grown in 47 countries and is a significant component of subsistence cropping systems for farmers in the Indian Subcontinent, West Asia, the Mediterranean Basin, and certain areas of East and North Africa. More than 90% of the chickpea crops are grown in eight countries, including India, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Ethiopia, Mexico, Australia and Canada, in decreasing order.
Many species of plant-parasitic nematodes have been reported in the roots and rhizosphere of chickpea in the major growing regions in the world (Table 1). However, only certain nematode species are considered constraints to chickpea production, causing an estimated 14% in annual yield losses (61,68). The symptoms and signs of nematode parasitism on chickpea differ depending upon the nematode’s feeding habit. Moreover, nematode attacks can make plants more sensitive to other biotic and abiotic stresses, and overall result in stunting and poor yield.
Descripción14 pages, 13 figures.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-6-0840
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/9769
DOI10.1094/PDIS-92-6-0840
ISSN0191-2917
Aparece en las colecciones: (IAS) Artículos

Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on 02-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

356
checked on 22-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.