English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/97244
Compartir / Impacto:
Estadísticas
Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMas-Bleda, Amalia-
dc.contributor.authorThelwall, Mike-
dc.contributor.authorKousha, Kayvan-
dc.contributor.authorAguillo, Isidro F.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-26T15:56:11Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-26T15:56:11Z-
dc.date.issued2014-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationScientometrics 101(1): 337-356 (2014)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/97244-
dc.description.abstractAcademics can now use the web and the social websites to disseminate scholarly information in a variety of different ways. Although some scholars have taken advantage of these new online opportunities, it is not clear how widespread their uptake is or how much impact they can have. This study assesses the extent to which successful scientists have social web presences, focusing on one influential group: highly cited researchers working at European institutions. It also assesses the impact of these presences. We manually and systematically identified if the European highly cited researchers had profiles in Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, Mendeley, Academia and LinkedIn or any content in SlideShare. We then used URL mentions and altmetric indicators to assess the impact of the web presences found. Although most of the scientists had an institutional website of some kind, few had created a profile in any social website investigated, and LinkedIn - the only non-academic site in the list - was the most popular. Scientists having one kind of social web profile were more likely to have another in many cases, especially in the life sciences and engineering. In most cases it was possible to estimate the relative impact of the profiles using a readily available statistic and there were disciplinary differences in the impact of the different kinds of profiles. Most social web profiles had some evidence of uptake, if not impact; nevertheless, the value of the indicators used is unclear.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.relation.isversionofPreprintes_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectHighly cited researcherses_ES
dc.subjectweb presencees_ES
dc.subjectEuropees_ES
dc.subjectIndicatorses_ES
dc.subjectImpactes_ES
dc.subjectSocial webes_ES
dc.subjectassessmentes_ES
dc.titleDo Highly Cited Researchers Successfully use the Social Web?es_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IPP) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Do HCR Successfully use the Social Web (preprint).pdf134,14 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.