English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/94795
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Physiological differences explain the co-existence of different regeneration strategies in Mediterranean ecosystems

AuthorsVilagrosa, Alberto; Hernández Lledó, Encarni I.; Luis, V.; Cochard, H.; Pausas, J. G.
KeywordsXylem hydraulic characteristics
Resprouting
Regeneration syndrome
Plant functional traits
Mediterranean ecosystems
Fire
Cavitation
Drought resistance
Issue DateMar-2014
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons
CitationNew Phytologist 201(4): 1277-1288 (2014)
AbstractFire and drought are selective driving forces in Mediterranean plants, and thus their ability to resprout or recruit after these disturbances is of paramount importance. The contrast in regeneration niche between resprouters and seeders, and each group's different root characteristics, suggest that they are subjected to different degrees of environmental stress and, consequently, to different evolutionary forces. We compared leaf traits, xylem traits related to hydraulic efficiency and vulnerability to cavitation, and the physiological response to an imposed drought between seedlings of resprouters and seedlings of seeders. We used 12 species co-existing in Mediterranean basin ecosystems. Major differences were found in the xylem architecture and leaf traits, and in the response to drought conditions. Seeders were more efficient at transporting water to leaves but formed, in turn, a safer xylem network. They also presented higher photosynthesis and transpiration rates, and earlier stomatal closure with drought, but good leaf dehydration tolerance. Seeders and resprouters can be considered two syndromes whose different functional characteristics are related to water availability and drought responses. These characteristics, together with their differences in rooting habits, account for their distinct regeneration niches and, thus, their co-existence. © 2013 New Phytologist Trust.
Publisher version (URL)https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12584
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/94795
DOI10.1111/nph.12584
Identifiersissn: 0028-646X
Appears in Collections:(CIDE) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.