English   español  
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/89707
COMPARTIR / IMPACTO:
Estadísticas
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorColom González, Francisco-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-21T14:22:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-21T14:22:34Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-
dc.identifier.citationRECODE Online Working Paper Serieses_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/89707-
dc.description17 páginases_ES
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the claims for legal self-regulation made by some religious minorities in Western societies. Such claims have often reached the legal system of the state, either through arbitration practices, judicial litigation on religious marital agreements or personal status laws, and they have also stirred public discussion in the political arena. Both circumstances have substantial implications for legal and political theory: whereas the interaction of religious and civil law has sometimes resulted in legal hybridization, the cultural exceptions to the rule of law are a politically sensitive issue. After reviewing several experiences with religious arbitration and the ‘interlegality’ resulting from the cultural transplant of legal norms, it is maintained that the legitimacy of these types of claims can be significantly enhanced by intercultural legal hermeneutics and democratic deliberation. These two approaches presuppose a dialogical evaluation of the principles guiding social relations. Accordingly, two complementary strategies are suggested to tackle the challenges of legal pluralism: an intercultural approach to legal interpretation, and the public deliberation on the normative purpose lying behind the possible granting of legal autonomy to religious groups.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Science Foundation: Standing Committee for the Social Sciences SCSS) Standing Committee for the Humanities (SCH)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEuropean Science Foundationes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseries21es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.subjectLegal pluralismes_ES
dc.subjectGroup self-regulationes_ES
dc.subjectReligious diversityes_ES
dc.titleThe Legal Self-regulation of Religious Groups: Tackling the Challenges of Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practicees_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.recode.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Fin_RECODE-21-Colom-2014_Final_fin1.pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.e-issnISSN 2242-3559-
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Science Foundation-
dc.identifier.funderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000782es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: (CCHS-IFS) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
RECODE-21-Colom-2014.pdf696,67 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record
 


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.