English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/87573
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Effect of soil management and traffic on soil erosion in irrigated annual crops

AuthorsBoulal, Hakim ; Gómez Macpherson, H. ; Gómez Calero, José Alfonso ; Mateos, Luciano
Issue Date2011
PublisherElsevier
CitationSoil and Tillage Research 115-116: 62-70 (2011)
AbstractConservation agriculture with controlled traffic has been suggested as one way to improve water infiltration and reduce soil losses in irrigated annual crops in Mediterranean environments, but little research is available. In 2009, we compared two soil-management systems for a maize (Zea mays L.)-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cropping system in Córdoba (Southern Spain): permanent beds with crop-residue retention on surface ground (PB) and conventionally tilled beds (tilled with a disc harrow, then a chisel plough and rotavator before bed forming) with residues incorporated into the soil (CB). The soil was a loamy alluvial Typic Xerofluvent. Traffic was controlled and two types of furrows were distinguished in each tillage system: with (+T) and without (-T) wheel traffic. We hypothesized that PB combined with controlled traffic could reduce soil erosion and enhance infiltration compared to CB. The effects on soil erosion caused by sprinkler irrigation or rainfall events were evaluated at field-scale (water application intensities of 0.26 and 0.30mmmin-1 in Trial 1 and Trial 2, respectively) and with a rainfall-simulator (mini-plots 0.9m×0.9m in size and a water application intensity of 1mmmin-1), respectively. In irrigation Trial 1 (on bare soil), soil loss in PB+T furrows was 4gm-2, about one-ninth that in CB+T furrows. -T furrows did not produce runoff in this trial. In irrigation Trial 2 (on soil covered by a cotton crop), soil loss in CB (59gm-2) was double that in PB, and in +T it was about three times that in -T (64gm-2 vs. 23gm-2). The results obtained using intense simulated rainfall at the mini-plot scale showed similar relative differences to those obtained from the irrigation trials at the field scale, except that the protective effect on the soil of the crop residues in PB was more noticeable than in the irrigation trials. Complementary trials using mini-ring infiltrometers (9.6cm in diameter), aimed at characterizing small-scale infiltration variability, i.e., differences between beds and furrows, gave highly variable results, sometimes contradicting those obtained from the mini-plot and field-scale trials. The results are valid for the Mediterranean environment where the study was conducted but should motivate similar research in other environments where agricultural systems are susceptible to rain- or irrigation-induced soil erosion. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/87573
DOI10.1016/j.still.2011.07.003
Identifiersdoi: 10.1016/j.still.2011.07.003
issn: 0167-1987
Appears in Collections:(IAS) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.