Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/81381
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

Nitrate leaching from soils under a maize-wheat-maize sequence, two irrigation schedules and three types of fertilisers

AutorDíez López, José Antonio CSIC; Román, R.; Caballero, Rafael CSIC; Caballero, A. CSIC ORCID
Palabras claveNitrate leaching
Efficient irrigation
MOW compost
Chemical fertilisers
Fecha de publicación1997
EditorElsevier
CitaciónAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 65: 189-199 (1997)
ResumenTo implement measures to tackle the nitrate leaching problem it is necessary to assess the effect of alternative agricultural practices in vulnerable zones. A 3-year experiment was conducted at La Poveda Field Station (30 km southeast of Madrid, Spain) to assess the effects of irrigation schedules (conventional vs. efficient) and fertiliser types (unfertilised control, urea, Floranid32 (a slow-release N fertiliser), and municipal organic waste (MOW) compost) on nitrate leaching, grain yield and N uptake by plants. Treatments were combined in a factorial model and distributed to 24 plots. Chemical fertilisers were applied at the rate of 150 kg N ha-1 to maize (1993 and 1995 growing seasons) and 100 kg N ha-1 to wheat (1994 growing seasons). The MOW compost was applied at a single dose before 1993 maize planting at the rate of 27.5 Mg ha-1, Conventional irrigated plots were overwatered and the water input in efficient irrigated plots was dosed according to plant consumption. Nitrate discharge was calculated by multiplying the seasonal drainage volume by the concentration of nitrates in soil water solution, both at 1.4 m soil depth. Seasonal drainage was calculated by using the water balance equation after measuring water movement (tensiometers) and water storage throughout the soil profile (neutron probe). Nitrate concentration was measured in samples extracted with ceramic cups. Drainage losses throughout the experiment were 184 and 38 mm in plots irrigated with conventional and efficient schedules, respectively. Corresponding nitrate-nitrogen discharge in both sets of plots were 128 and 25 kg N ha-1 across fertiliser types. The nitrate discharge in unfertilised plots from the soil N reserve was on average half than that in fertilised ones. The MOW compost treatment combined with efficient irrigation showed promise in controlling nitrate discharge. Maize yields were unaffected by fertiliser type, but wheat yields decreased by 33% in unfertilised plots. It is concluded that, at a given rate of chemical fertiliser, nitrate loading to the aquifer can be traced to drainage discharge and that safe loading of MOW compost to soils requires control of water inputs. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
Descripción11 páginas, 3 figuras y 4 tablas estadísticas
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/81381
ISSN0167-8809
Aparece en las colecciones: (ICA) Artículos




Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
restringido.pdf21,67 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

Page view(s)

293
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

319
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.