English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/78866
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCallén Romero, Mª Soledad-
dc.contributor.authorLópez Sebastián, José Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorMastral Lamarca, Ana María-
dc.identifierdoi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1241-1-
dc.identifierissn: 0944-1344-
dc.identifiere-issn: 1614-7499-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research 20(5): 3240-3251 (2013)-
dc.description11 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables-
dc.description.abstractImproving knowledge on the apportionment of airborne particulate matter will be useful to handle and fulfill the legislation regarding this pollutant. The main aim of this work was to assess the influence of markers in the source apportionment of airborne PM10, in particular, whether the use of particle polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and ions provided similar results to the ones obtained using not only the mentioned markers but also gas phase PAH and trace elements. In order to reach this aim, two receptor models: UNMIX and positive matrix factorization were applied to two sets of data in Zaragoza city from airborne PM10, a previously reported campaign (2003-2004) (Callén et al. Chemosphere 76:1120-1129, 2009), where PAH associated to the gas and particle phases, ions and trace elements were used as markers and a long sampling campaign (2001-2009), where only PAH in the particle phase and ions were analyzed. For both campaigns, positive matrix factorization was able to explain a higher number of sources than the UNMIX model. Independently of the sampling campaign and the receptor model used, soil resuspension was the main PM10 source, especially in the warm period (21st March-21st September), where most of the PM10 exceedances were produced. Despite some of the markers of anthropogenic sources were different for both campaigns, common sources associated to different combustion sources (coal, light-oil, heavier-oil, biomass, and traffic) were found and PAH in particle phase and ions seemed to be good markers for the airborne PM10 apportionment. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.-
dc.description.sponsorshipAuthors would like to thank Aula Dei-CSIC (R. Gracia) for providing the meteorological data and the CSIC for the Ramón y Cajal contract to J.M.L. Authors would also thank the Spanish Government (MICIIN) for the partial financial support of this work through the contract CGL2009-14113-C02-01 and the E plan for the co-funding.-
dc.publisherSpringer Nature-
dc.subjectReceptor model-
dc.subjectAir pollution-
dc.subjectSource apportionment-
dc.titleInfluence of organic and inorganic markers in the source apportionment of airborne PM10 in Zaragoza (Spain) by two receptor models-
dc.description.versionPeer Reviewed-
Appears in Collections:(ICB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Influence of organic and inorg.....2013.pdf416,18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Show simple item record

Related articles:

WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.