English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/78688
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from complex phototrophic biofilms

AuthorsFerrera, Isabel ; Massana, Ramon ; Balagué, Vanessa ; Pedrós-Alió, Carlos ; Sánchez, Olga ; Mas, Jordi
KeywordsPhototrophic biofilms
Microbial diversity
DNA extraction
Sulfide removal
Issue DateApr-2010
PublisherTaylor & Francis
CitationBiofouling 26(3): 349-357 (2010)
AbstractPhototrophic biofilms are used in a variety of biotechnological and industrial processes. Understanding their structure, ie microbial composition, is a necessary step for understanding their function and, ultimately, for the success of their application. DNA analysis methods can be used to obtain information on the taxonomic composition and relative abundance of the biofilm members. The potential bias introduced by DNA extraction methods in the study of the diversity of a complex phototrophic sulfide-oxidizing biofilm was examined. The efficiency of eight different DNA extraction methods combining physical, mechanical and chemical procedures was assessed. Methods were compared in terms of extraction efficiency, measured by DNA quantification, and detectable diversity (16S rRNA genes recovered), evaluated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Significant differences were found in DNA yields ranging from 116 ± 12 to 1893 ± 96 ng of DNA. The different DGGE fingerprints ranged from 7 to 12 bands. Methods including phenol–chloroform extraction after enzymatic lysis resulted in the greatest DNA yields and detectable diversity. Additionally, two methods showing similar yields and retrieved diversity were compared by cloning and sequencing. Clones belonging to members of the Alpha-, Beta- and Gamma- proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and to the Firmicutes were recovered from both libraries. However, when bead-beating was applied, clones belonging to the Deltaproteobacteria were also recovered, as well as plastid signatures. Phenol–chloroform extraction after bead-beating and enzymatic lysis was therefore considered to be the most suitable method for DNA extraction from such highly diverse phototrophic biofilms
Description9 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08927011003605870
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/78688
DOI10.1080/08927011003605870
Identifiersdoi: 10.1080/08927011003605870
issn: 0892-7014
e-issn: 1029-2454
Appears in Collections:(ICM) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.