English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/65008
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
Title

Comparison of decision tools to improve the nitrogen management in irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions in Spain

AuthorsIsla Climente, Ramón ; Valentín, Francisco; Quílez Sáez de Viteri, Dolores ; Guillén, Mónica ; Aibar, Joaquín; Maturano, Marisa
Keywordsmaize
nitrogen fertilizer
sprinkler irrigation
non-point contamination
Issue Date2012
PublisherAustralian Agronomy Conference
CitationCapturing Opportunities and Overcoming Obstacles in Australian Agronomy". Edited by I. Yunusa. Proceedings of 16th Australian Agronomy Conference 2012, 14-18 October 2012, Armidale, NSW.
AbstractRecent studies at watershed scale indicate that the excessive use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer in irrigated maize is one of the major contributors to non-point nitrate pollution of waters in some agricultural areas of Spain. There is a need to provide relatively easy and practical decision tools to help farmers to increase N use efficiency in maize fields which simultaneously will increase crop profits and reduce environmental problems from excessive N use. Four field trials with different soil types were conducted in three different locations in Spain during the years 2010 and 2011 to compare three N fertilizer managements. These were (T1) a fixed N rate considering the crop potential of the zone, 200-250 kg N/ha, (T2) a variable rate of N depending on mineral soil N content before plant sowing, (T3) a variable rate of N depending of chlorophyll meter reading (CMR) at V15 stage. A control (T0) treatment without N application and an over fertilized treatment (T4) of 300 kg N/ha were also included. These five treatments were evaluated under 3 different initial soil nitrate concentrations (low, medium, and high), prior to sowing. Total N-fertilizer applied, grain yield and N-fertilizer use efficiency (NUEf) are presented and discussed. Our results showed that the two decision tools evaluated (T2 and T3) allowed for a reduction in total N fertilizer applied in two of the four experimental sites compared to the fixed N rate (T1) without yield penalties. In the other two sites the T3 treatment reduced the N applied but the soil criteria (T2) did not allow to reduce the N applications. The NUEf of the overfertilized plots (T4) was, in general, lower than in the N management treatments T1, T2 and T3. The use of the decision tools did not always significantly increase the NUEf compared with a reduced fixed dose of N fertilizer (T1). The methodology used should be refined to better adjust the N rates to different soil types and environments. However, results indicate that the use of soil tests before planting or chlorophyll meter readings at later vegetative stage can significantly improve the management of N in irrigated maize crops, reducing the negative effects of excessive nitrogen fertilizers use in agricultural areas.
Description5 Pags., 3 Tabls., 1 Fig.
Publisher version (URL)http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2012/nutrition/8333_rislar.htm#TopOfPage
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/65008
Appears in Collections:(EEAD) Comunicaciones congresos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
QuilezD_Congress-ACC_2012.pdf160,49 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.