Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/56333
Share/Export:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invite to open peer review
Title

A framework about flow measurements by LDA–PDA as a spatio-temporal average: application to data post-processing

AuthorsCalvo, Esteban; García, J. A.; Santolaya, José Luis; García, I.; Aísa, L.
KeywordsPhase Doppler anemometry
Laser Doppler anemometry
Issue Date2012
PublisherInstitute of Physics Publishing
CitationMeasurement Science and Technology 23(5): 055202 (2912)
AbstractPhase Doppler anemometry (PDA) is a well-established technique to study two-phase flows and its principles are also used in laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) for measurements of fluid velocity. Raw measurements of individual particle data require post-processing to obtain useful and consistent information (moments of velocity, particle concentration and flux, velocity autocorrelation, etc). This is called in this paper the reconstruction of statistical information. In the 1970s, several basic algorithms to perform the statistical reconstruction were developed for LDA measurements (such as the transit time method, the inverse velocity method, etc). With the advent of PDA, the scientific community developed reconstruction algorithms to obtain mean variables of the dispersed phase. All these basic algorithms were expounded as unconnected methods, following independent threads not integrated into a general framework. Assuming that the PDA works under ideal conditions (all particles that cross the probe volume are validated), this paper provides a general formulation and fully systematizes a large set of previous statistical reconstruction methods. In this paper, the statistical reconstruction of both the dispersed and the continuous phase is unified: the continuous phase post-processing emerges as the same reconstruction method of the dispersed phase. The general framework proposed offers many advantages. First, some previous calculation methods of particle concentration turn out to be particular cases of this general formulation. Second, it provides an easy way to deduce unbiased estimators of any statistical parameter of the flow. Third, a wide set of new post-processing methods are proposed to be tested by any member of the scientific community. In the fourth place, the generalized integral method to compute the particle concentration also gives information about the probe volume geometry and two new auto-calibration algorithms are proposed: the integral calibration method and the cross-section integral calibration method. Finally, a physical interpretation of the statistical reconstruction process is provided: it is a spatio-temporal averaging of the detected particle data, and some of the algorithms used are related to the Eulerian–Eulerian mathematical description of multiphase flows
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/055202
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/56333
DOI10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/055202
ISSN0957-0233
Appears in Collections:(LIFTEC) Artículos




Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
accesoRestringido.pdf15,38 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Apr 13, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
checked on Feb 27, 2024

Page view(s)

454
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Download(s)

125
checked on Apr 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.