Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/48775
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorArlettaz, Raphaël-
dc.contributor.authorRuedi, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorPalmeirim, Jorge M.-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-24T08:35:08Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-24T08:35:08Z-
dc.date.issued1997-05-
dc.identifier.citationJ. ZooL, Lond. (1997) 242, 45—62es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/48775-
dc.description.abstractThe actual geographic distribution of the two sibling mouse-eared bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii, which occur widely sympatrically in the western Palaearctic region, remains largely controversial. This concerns particularly the specific attribution of marginal populations from the Mediterranean islands and from adjacent areas of North Africa and Asia, which are morphologically intermediate between continental M. myotis and M. blythii from Europe. This study attempts to clarify this question by using four different approaches: cranial morphology, external morphology, genetics and trophic ecology. The three latter methods show unambiguously that North Africa, Malta, Sardinia and Corsica are presently inhabited by monospecific populations of M. myotis. In contrast, cranial morphometrics do not yield conclusive results. These results contradict all recent studies, which attribute North African and Maltese mouse-eared bats to M. blythii and consider that Sardinia and Corsica harbour sympatric populations of the two species. As concerns south-eastern populations, doubts are also expressed about the attribution of the subspecific taxon oman which may actually refer to M. myotis instead of M. blythii. Protein electrophoresis is presently the only absolute method available for determining M. myotis and M. blythii throughout their distribution ranges. However, species identification may be approached by relying on less sophiticated morphometrical methods as presented in this study. Species-specific habitat specializations are probably responsible for the differences observed between the geographic distributions of M. myotis and M. blythii, as they provide a logical groundwork for a coherent model of speciation for these two bat specieses_ES
dc.publisherRoyal Society (Great Britain)es_ES
dc.rightsopenAccesses_ES
dc.titleA new perspective on the zoogeography of the sibling mouse-eared bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii: morphological, genetical and ecological evidencees_ES
dc.typeartículoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb02928.x-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer reviewedes_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb02928.xes_ES
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EBD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
1997 zoogeography m myotis_blythii j zool.doc1,04 MBMicrosoft WordVisualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

51
checked on 17-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

50
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

436
checked on 24-abr-2024

Download(s)

357
checked on 24-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.