Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/3873
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMoret-Fernández, David-
dc.contributor.authorArrúe Ugarte, José Luis-
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-29T08:57:27Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-29T08:57:27Z-
dc.date.issued2007-06-08-
dc.identifier.citationSoil and Tillage Research, Volume 96, Issues 1-2, October 2007, Pages 103-113en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-1987-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/3873-
dc.descriptionThe definitive version is available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01671987en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is limited information on the effects of tillage practices on soil hydraulic properties, especially changes with time. The objective of this study was to evaluate on a long-term field experiment the influence of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT) on the dynamics of soil hydraulic properties over 3 consecutive 16–18 month fallow periods. Surface measurements of soil dry bulk density (ρb), soil hydraulic conductivity (K(ψ)) at −14, −4, −1 and 0 cm pressure heads using a tension disc infiltrometer, and derived hydraulic parameters (pore size, number of pores per unit of area and water-transmission porosity) calculated using the Poiseuille's Law were taken on four different dates over the fallow period, namely, before and immediately after primary tillage, after post-tillage rains and at the end of fallow. Under consolidated structured soil conditions, NT plots presented the most compacted topsoil layer when compared with CT and RT. Soil hydraulic conductivity under NT was, for the entire range of pressure head applied, significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that measured for CT and RT. However, NT showed the largest mean macropore size (0.99, 0.95 and 2.08 mm for CT, RT and NT, respectively; P < 0.05) but the significantly lowest number of water-conducting pores per unit area (74.1, 118.5 and 1.4 macropores per m2 for CT, RT and NT, respectively; P < 0.05). Overall, water flow was mainly regulated by macropores even though they represented a small fraction of total soil porosity. No significant differences in hydraulic properties were found between CT and RT. In the short term, tillage operations significantly increased K (P < 0.05) for the entire range of pressure head applied, which was likely a result of an increase in water-conducting mesopores despite a decrease in estimated mesopore diameter. Soil reconsolidation following post-tillage rains reduced K at a rate that increased with the intensity of the rainfall events.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología of Spain (Grants no. AGF98-0261-C02-02 and AGL 2001-2238-CO2-01 and PNFPI predoctoral fellowship and research contract awarded to the first author) and the European Union (FEDER funds).en_US
dc.format.extent186867 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectTillage managementen_US
dc.subjectHydraulic conductivityen_US
dc.subjectFallow perioden_US
dc.titleDynamics of soil hydraulic properties during fallow as affected by tillageen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.still.2007.04.003-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Aparece en las colecciones: (EEAD) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
Manuscript_STR_Moret_corr.pdf182,49 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

132
checked on 21-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

123
checked on 23-feb-2024

Page view(s)

493
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

473
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.