Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/35972
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Título

An evaluation of different kinetic models for determining the kinetic coefficients in sugar cane straw–clay ash/lime system

AutorVillar-Cociña, E.; Frías, Moisés CSIC ORCID ; Valencia-Morales, E.; Sánchez de Rojas, María Isabel CSIC ORCID
Palabras clavereaction kinetics
sugar cane
pozzolanic activity
Fecha de publicación2006
EditorInstitution of Civil Engineers (Great Britain)
CitaciónAdvances in Cement Research 18(1): 17-26(2006)
Resumen[EN] The paper presents a comparative study in which different kinetic models were applied to describe the reaction kinetics of a mixture of sugar cane straw with 20 and 30% of clay, burned at 800 and 1000°C (SCSCA), and hydrated lime [calcium hydroxide (CH)]. Classical models, such as the Jander, Jander Modified and Zuravlev models were applied. These models were compared with a kinetic-diffusive model previously published by some of the present authors. The models were fitted to the experimental data by computerised methods, which allowed the computation of the kinetic parameters that rigorously characterise the pozzolanic activity of the materials. The results showed that Jander, Jander Modified and Zuravlev models did not describe the pozzolanic reaction kinetics in this system correctly, whereas the model proposed by the authors gave the best results with respect to fitting to the experimental data. This demonstrated that the model proposed by the authors was the most adequate for describing the reaction kinetics in the SCSCA system.
Versión del editorhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.1680/adcr.2006.18.1.17
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/35972
DOI10.1680/adcr.2006.18.1.17
ISSN0951-7197
E-ISSN1751-7605
Aparece en las colecciones: (IETCC) Artículos

Mostrar el registro completo

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

31
checked on 08-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

26
checked on 28-feb-2024

Page view(s)

371
checked on 18-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.