Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/3473
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBlaschke, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorKrallinger, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorValencia, Alfonso-
dc.contributor.authorLeón, Eduardo Andrés-
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-08T11:06:11Z-
dc.date.available2008-04-08T11:06:11Z-
dc.date.issued2005-05-24-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Bioinformatics. 2005; 6(Suppl 1): S16en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/3473-
dc.descriptionFrom A critical assessment of text mining methods in molecular biologyen_US
dc.description.abstract[Background] Molecular Biology accumulated substantial amounts of data concerning functions of genes and proteins. Information relating to functional descriptions is generally extracted manually from textual data and stored in biological databases to build up annotations for large collections of gene products. Those annotation databases are crucial for the interpretation of large scale analysis approaches using bioinformatics or experimental techniques. Due to the growing accumulation of functional descriptions in biomedical literature the need for text mining tools to facilitate the extraction of such annotations is urgent. In order to make text mining tools useable in real world scenarios, for instance to assist database curators during annotation of protein function, comparisons and evaluations of different approaches on full text articles are needed.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Results] The Critical Assessment for Information Extraction in Biology (BioCreAtIvE) contest consists of a community wide competition aiming to evaluate different strategies for text mining tools, as applied to biomedical literature. We report on task two which addressed the automatic extraction and assignment of Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of human proteins, using full text articles. The predictions of task 2 are based on triplets of protein – GO term – article passage. The annotation-relevant text passages were returned by the participants and evaluated by expert curators of the GO annotation (GOA) team at the European Institute of Bioinformatics (EBI). Each participant could submit up to three results for each sub-task comprising task 2. In total more than 15,000 individual results were provided by the participants. The curators evaluated in addition to the annotation itself, whether the protein and the GO term were correctly predicted and traceable through the submitted text fragment.en_US
dc.description.abstract[Conclusion] Concepts provided by GO are currently the most extended set of terms used for annotating gene products, thus they were explored to assess how effectively text mining tools are able to extract those annotations automatically. Although the obtained results are promising, they are still far from reaching the required performance demanded by real world applications. Among the principal difficulties encountered to address the proposed task, were the complex nature of the GO terms and protein names (the large range of variants which are used to express proteins and especially GO terms in free text), and the lack of a standard training set. A range of very different strategies were used to tackle this task. The dataset generated in line with the BioCreative challenge is publicly available and will allow new possibilities for training information extraction methods in the domain of molecular biology.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Protein Design Group (PDG) contributions to the BioCreAtIvE workshop were funded by the European Commission as part of the E-BioSci and ORIEL projects, contract nos. QLRI-CT-2001-30266 and IST-2001-32688, under the RTD Programs "Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources" and "Multimedia Content and Tools (KA3)". The work of M. Krallinger was sponsored by DOC scholarship program of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.en_US
dc.format.extent453396 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofPublisher's version-
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of BioCreAtIvE assessment of task 2en_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2105-6-S1-S16-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid15960828-
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Aparece en las colecciones: (CNB) Artículos
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato
picrender.pdf442,77 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

PubMed Central
Citations

54
checked on 04-abr-2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

113
checked on 19-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

79
checked on 26-feb-2024

Page view(s)

376
checked on 23-abr-2024

Download(s)

198
checked on 23-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Artículos relacionados:


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.