English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/31519
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

PS-InSAR processing methodologies in the detection of field surface deformation—Study of the Granada basin (Central Betic Cordilleras, southern Spain)

AuthorsSousa, Joaquim J.; Ruíz Armenteros, Antonio; Hanssen, Ramón F.; Bastos, Luisa; Gil, Antonio; Galindo-Zaldívar, Jesús; Sanz de Galdeano, Carlos
KeywordsPS-InSAR
Deformation
DePSI
StaMPS
Granada basin
Radar interferometry
Issue DateApr-2010
PublisherElsevier
CitationJournal of Geodynamics 49(3-4): 181-189 (2010)
AbstractDifferential SAR interferometry (DInSAR) is a very effective technique for measuring crustal deformation. However, almost all interferograms include large areas where the signals decorrelate and no measurements are possible. Persistent scatterer interferometry (PS-InSAR) overcomes the decorrelation problem by identifying resolution elements whose echo is dominated by a single scatterer in a series of interferograms. Two time series of 29 ERS-1/2 and 22 ENVISAT ASAR acquisitions of the Granada basin, located in the central sector of the Betic Cordillera (southern Spain), covering the period from 1992 to 2005, were analyzed. Rough topography of the study area associated to its moderate activity geodynamic setting, including faults and folds in an uplifting relief by the oblique Eurasian–African plate convergence, poses a challenge for the application of interferometric techniques. The expected tectonic deformation rates are in the order of 1 mm/yr, which are at the feasibility limit of current InSAR techniques. In order to evaluate whether, under these conditions, InSAR techniques can still be used to monitor deformations we have applied and compared two PS-InSAR approaches: DePSI, the PS-InSAR package developed at Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) and StaMPS (Stanford Method for Persistent Scatterers) developed at Stanford University. Ground motion processes have been identified for the first time in the study area, the most significant process being a subsidence bowl located at the village of Otura. The idea behind this comparative study is to analyze which of the two PS-InSAR approaches considered might be more appropriate for the study of specific areas/environments and to attempt to evaluate the potentialities and benefits that could be derived for the integration of those methodologies.
Description9 páginas, 8 figuras, 1 tabla.
Publisher version (URL)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2009.12.002
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/31519
DOI10.1016/j.jog.2009.12.002
ISSN0264-3707
Appears in Collections:(IACT) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.