English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/30696
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE logo core CORE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE

Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:

Title

Does shelter enhance early seedling survival in dry environments? A test with eight Mediterranean species

AuthorsPadilla, Francisco M. ; Miranda, Juan de Dios; Ortega, Rafael; Hervás, Manuel ; Sánchez, Joaquín; Pugnaire, Francisco I.
KeywordsArid environments
forest restoration
tree shelters
Woody seedlings
Drought
Issue Date23-Dec-2010
AbstractQuestion: In the restoration of degraded arid environments, woody seedling survival is threatened by drought, extreme temperatures and radiance, and herbivory. Shelter may provide planted seedlings with suitable microsites; however, the effects of shelter provision under very dry conditions are not well known. Therefore a better understanding is needed to improve the success of restoration programs. Here we asked whether two types of tree shelters, solid-walled polyethylene tubes and mesh fabric tubes, improved short-term survival of eight Mediterranean tree and shrub species often used in the restoration of arid environments. Location: We conducted two experimental plantations in degraded field sites in the province of Almería (SE Spain), under arid Mediterranean conditions. Methods: One-year-old seedlings of Ceratonia siliqua, Juniperus phoenicea, Olea europaea, Pinus halepensis, P. pinaster, Quercus coccifera, Q. ilex and Tetraclinis articulata were planted either sheltered by one of the above shelter tubes, or by being left unsheltered. Survival was recorded the first growing season after planting, which 33 was a very dry season. Results: Overall, seedling survival ranged from as little as 0% to 24%, and tree shelters consistently enhanced survival in Quercus species only, ranging from 16% in walled shelters to 8% in mesh shelters. Shelters failed to boost survival in the six remaining species. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that both walled and mesh shelters were mostly ineffective at increasing seedling survival for the Mediterranean species used in this experiment, which strongly coincide with those used in restoration programs. The use of shelters in restoration programs conducted in arid environments should be reconsidered, while walled shelters might be advisable for Mediterranean Quercus species only. Further research is necessary to develop and assess improved types of shelters for arid environments.
Publisher version (URL)http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01094.x/pdf
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/30696
DOI10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01094.x
Appears in Collections:(EEZA) Artículos
(IBVF) Artículos
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Padilla et al. 2010. AVS.pdf334,28 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show full item record
Review this work
 

Related articles:


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.