English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/28081
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCañellas-Boltà, Núria-
dc.contributor.authorRull, Valentí-
dc.contributor.authorVigo, Josep-
dc.contributor.authorMercadé, Arnau-
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-30T07:22:13Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-30T07:22:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationHolocene 19(8): 1185–1200 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6836-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/28081-
dc.description16 p.en_US
dc.description.abstract[EN] Modern proxy-calibration studies are a powerful tool for paleoecological interpretation. This paper analyzes the relationships among modern pollen rain, vegetation and altitude in the central Pyrenees, where several paleo-palynological studies have been developed, but a modern analog survey is still unavailable. The work analyzes the pollen content of moss polsters from different vegetation communities along an altitudinal transect, as well as the flora and vegetation using the Braun-Blanquet system. DCCA showed that altitude satisfactorily explains both vegetation (r2 = 0.988) and pollen (r2 = 0.841) gradients. Besides the complexity of pollen–vegetation relationships, some regularities were found to be useful for paleoecological and paleoenvironmental interpretation. In general, altitudinal vegetation and pollen patterns show similarities, but pollen belts and boundaries are less well defined, likely because of the homogenizing effect of upward wind transport. Palynological differentiation of montane from subalpine/alpine belts is straightforward from the trends of the more significant pollen types, mainly the low-altitude deciduous trees and the high-mountain herbs. Palynological differences between subalpine and alpine belts, which boundary coincides with the treeline, are more subtle and need quantitative criteria and complementary proxies. From an individual point of view, four main groups of pollen were distinguished, in relation to their usefulness as vegetation and altitudinal indicators: (1) very good indicators, (2) good indicators, (3) non indicators, and (4) allochthonous pollen types. The first two groups resulted to be useful as indicator taxa for modern analogs for paleovegetational and paleoaltitudinal reconstruction, while the latter two groups should be interpreted with caution in paleoenvironmental studies.en_US
dc.format.extent1589864 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPollen rainen_US
dc.subjectVegetation beltsen_US
dc.subjectMountainsen_US
dc.subjectPyreneesen_US
dc.titleModern pollen–vegetation relationships along an altitudinal transect in the Pyrenees (southwestern Europe)en_US
dc.typeArtículoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://hol.sagepub.com/content/19/8/1185.abstracten_US
Appears in Collections:(IBB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.