English   español  
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/27983
Share/Impact:
Statistics
logo share SHARE   Add this article to your Mendeley library MendeleyBASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL
Exportar a otros formatos:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRull, Valentí-
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-23T12:25:06Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-23T12:25:06Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationThe Open Ecology Journal 3: 1-5 (2010)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1874-2130-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/27983-
dc.description5 p.en_US
dc.description.abstract[EN] Despite what their names might suggest, ecology and palaeoecology have progressed historically as well separated disciplines. This unfortunate disjunction is analyzed here from a theoretical point of view. Among the factors that have facilitated the separation are: 1) the past-present dissociation characteristic of the human mind, 2) the diversity of fields of provenance of palaeoecologists, 3) the contrasting nature of the evidence and associated methodological differences, and 4) misunderstandings caused by the use of prefix palaeo-. The principle of uniformitarianism emphasizes that past, present and future are not discrete units but a time continuum through which species and communities flow, change and evolve; and that ecology and palaeoecology are only different approaches with a common objective, which is the ecological understanding of the biosphere. Therefore, a terminological clarification is needed. Ecology in a broad sense, includes inferences about the past (palaeoecology), present studies (neoecology or contemporary ecology) and future projections (predictive ecology). Palaeoecology is thus a means by which ecology studies the past using proxies. Other disciplines beginning with the prefix palaeo- (notably palaeoclimatology and palaeoenvironmental reconstruction) are not necessarily ecological. It is recommended that ecologists and palaeoecologists develop joint projects, and that palaeoecologists increase their participation in ecological journals, books and meetings. These collaborations will demonstrate that a palaeoecologist is not simply a palaeoscientist whose data may be of interest for ecology but is primarily an ecologist working on another time scale, with different methods.en_US
dc.format.extent430005 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBentham Science Publishersen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPalaeoecologyen_US
dc.subjectNeoecologyen_US
dc.subjectLong-term ecologyen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionen_US
dc.subjectSuccessionen_US
dc.subjectUniformitarianismen_US
dc.subjectEcological theoryen_US
dc.titleEcology and Palaeoecology: Two Approaches, One Objectiveen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.bentham.org/open/toecolj/openaccess2.htmen_US
Appears in Collections:(IBB) Artículos
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record
 


WARNING: Items in Digital.CSIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.