Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar a este item: http://hdl.handle.net/10261/23008
COMPARTIR / EXPORTAR:
logo share SHARE logo core CORE BASE
Visualizar otros formatos: MARC | Dublin Core | RDF | ORE | MODS | METS | DIDL | DATACITE

Invitar a revisión por pares abierta
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Gerardo-
dc.contributor.authorRohde, Rick-
dc.contributor.authorSeely, M.-
dc.contributor.authorKulls, C.-
dc.contributor.authorDahan, Ofer-
dc.contributor.authorYehouda, Enzel-
dc.contributor.authorTodd, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorBotero, Blanca-
dc.contributor.authorMorin, Efrat-
dc.contributor.authorGrodek, T.-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Carole-
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-09T11:17:36Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-09T11:17:36Z-
dc.date.issued2009-05-26-
dc.identifier.citationWater Resources Management 24: 641-667 (2010)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-4741-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/23008-
dc.description27 pages, figures, and tables statistics.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper summarises innovative research into the assessment of longterm groundwater recharge from flood events in dryland environments of the Kuiseb (Namibia) and the Buffels (South Africa) rivers. The integrated water resource management (IWRM) policies and institutions affecting the exploitation of groundwater resources in each of these developing countries are compared. The relatively large alluvial aquifer of the Kuiseb River (∼240 Mm3) is recharged from irregular floods originating in the upper catchment. Reported abstraction of 4.6 Mm3 per year is primarily consumed in the town of Walvis Bay, although the groundwater decay (pumping and natural losses along the period 1983–2005) was estimated in 14.8 Mm3 per year. Recharge is variable, occurring in 11 out of 13 years in the middle Kuiseb River, but only in 11 out of 28 years in the middle-lower reaches. In contrast, the Buffels River has relatively minor alluvial aquifers (∼11 Mm3) and recharge sources derive from both lateral subsurface flow and floodwater infiltration, the latter limited to a recharge maximum of 1.3 Mm3 during floods occurring once every four years. Current abstractions to supply the adjacent rural population and a few small-scale, irrigated commercial farms are 0.15 Mm3 yr−1, well within the long-term sustainable yield estimated to be 0.7 Mm3 yr−1. Since independence in 1990, Namibia’s water resource management approach has focussed on ephemeral river basin management of which the Kuiseb BasinManagement Committee (KBMC) is a model. Here, some water points are managed independently by rural communities through committees while the national bulk water supplier provides for Walvis BayMunicipality from the lower aquifers. This provides a sense of local ownership through local participation between government, NGOs and CBOs (community-based organisations) in the planning and implementation of IWRM. Despite the potential for water resource development in the lower Buffels River, the scope for implementingIWRMis limited not only by the small aquifer size, but also because basin management in South Africa is considered only in the context of perennial rivers. Since 2001, water service delivery in the Buffels River catchment has become the responsibility of two newly created local municipalities. As municipal government gains experience, skills and capacity, its ability to respond to local needs related to water service delivery will be accomplished through local participation in the design and implementation of annual ‘integrated development plans’. These two case studies demonstrate that a variety of IWRM strategies in the drylands of developing countries are appropriate depending on scales of governance, evolving policy frameworks, scales of need and limitations inherent in the hydrological processes of groundwater resources.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was funded by the 6th framework of the European Community through the project “FloodWater recharge of alluvial Aquifers in Dryland Environments”, WADE Project (contract no. GOCE-CT-2003-506680). Obbe Tuinenburg and the staff of Gobabeb Training and Research Centre are gratefully thanked for their assistance.en_US
dc.format.extent22195 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsclosedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNamibiaen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectEphemeral riversen_US
dc.subjectGroundwater rechargeen_US
dc.subjectFlood hydrologyen_US
dc.subjectInegrated water resource managementen_US
dc.subjectIWRMen_US
dc.titleManagement of Alluvial Aquifers in Two Southern African Ephemeral Rivers: Implications for IWRMen_US
dc.typeartículoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11269-009-9463-9-
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer revieweden_US
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9463-9en_US
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501es_ES
item.openairetypeartículo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Aparece en las colecciones: (IRN) Artículos
Show simple item record

CORE Recommender

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on 20-abr-2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

32
checked on 25-feb-2024

Page view(s)

342
checked on 19-abr-2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


NOTA: Los ítems de Digital.CSIC están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.